Targeted state economic development incentives and entrepreneurship

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between state economic development incentives programs and entrepreneurial activity. Design/methodology/approach The authors use panel data and a fixed-effects model to examine the determinants of five measures of entrepreneurial activity. To measure state economic development incentives programs, they use a new and substantially improved data set from Bartik (2017). They also include a measure for economic freedom, the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of North America index. Findings The authors find a robustly negative relationship between development incentives and patent activity. They find some evidence that incentives are negatively associated with small business establishments (<10 employees) as a percentage of total establishments but positively associated with the large business establishment (>500 employees) share. They also find evidence of a positive relationship between economic freedom and both patent activity and net business formation. Research limitations/implications The results imply that economic development incentive programs are unlikely to increase entrepreneurial activity and may decrease it. They also imply increased economic freedom (lower taxes, lower spending, and lower governmental restrictions on labor markets) may increase entrepreneurial activity. Originality/value To the authors’ knowledge, this paper provides the first examination of the relationship between development incentives and entrepreneurial activity that utilizes Bartik (2017), a new vastly improved data set of state economic development incentive programs. The paper also contributes to the literature on the relationship between economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity.

Green entrepreneurship in Saudi Arabia: shaping the landscape of the greener economy

“…The spiritual and material incentives enhance extrinsic and intrinsic motivations and green creativity (Liu and Liu, 2023). On the other hand, Tuszynski and Stansel's (2018) findings underline that in terms of SMEs, there is a negative association between incentives and patent activity and small business establishments. From employing the AMO theory, Mia et al (2022) claim that incentives, entrepreneurship education and skills have a positive and significant influence in promoting GE.…”

The Effects of State and Local Economic Incentives on Business Start-Ups in the United States: County-Level Evidence

“…Bruce and Deskins (2012) used counts of tax and nontax incentives in a panel framework and found a small positive relationship between tax incentives and their measures of entrepreneurial activity and a small, negative relationship between nontax incentives and sole proprietorships. Using a state-level version of the data used in this article, Tuszynski and Stansel (2018) found that incentives are negatively related to patents and small business establishments, are positively related to large business establishments, and have no significant relationship with new business formation or sole proprietorships. These two studies represent the most recent and comprehensive evidence regarding start-ups and economic development incentives.…”

The impact of local government economic development programs on city-level entrepreneurial activity: evidence from Southern California

“…Traditional theories of public administration and regulation see government agencies playing a primary role in institutions. This continues at the national level; however, recent studies highlight institutional elements separate from government, especially in the context of entrepreneurship (da Cunha and Arvate, 2021; Tuszynski and Stansel, 2018; Urban and Dlamini, 2020) and regional and local economic development, where government agencies participate within and facilitate economic and entrepreneurial ecosystems alongside other actors (Bramwell et al. , 2019; Jolley and Pittaway, 2019; von Bloh, 2021; Walsh, 2019).…”