2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1104295108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted Sos1 deletion reveals its critical role in early T-cell development

Abstract: Activation of the small G protein Ras is required for thymocyte differentiation. In thymocytes, Ras is activated by the Ras guanine exchange factors (RasGEFs) Sos1, Sos2, and RasGRP1. We report the development of a floxed allele of sos1 to assess the role of Sos1 during thymocyte development. Sos1 was required for pre–T-cell receptor (pre-TCR)– but not TCR-stimulated developmental signals. Sos1 deletion led to a partial block at the DN-to-DP transition. Sos1-deficient thymocytes showed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
99
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(87 reference statements)
11
99
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Agonist-driven negative selection (that elicits strong and transient ERK activation) (28) might instead favor SOS1-GRB2/LAT-type signalosomes during the late phases of (or post) positive selection, when THEMIS levels decrease, thus favoring cell death. The observation that positive section requires THEMIS (1-3), but not SOS proteins (27), and recent data that SOS1 is instead required for negative selection (29) agree with this model. A functional role of constitutive THEMIS-GRB2 association in thymocyte positive selection agrees with data on conditional ablation of GRB2 in thymocytes (30), which showed that GRB2-SH2 and -SH3C (required for association to THEMIS) were found to be indispensable for thymocyte development (30).…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…Agonist-driven negative selection (that elicits strong and transient ERK activation) (28) might instead favor SOS1-GRB2/LAT-type signalosomes during the late phases of (or post) positive selection, when THEMIS levels decrease, thus favoring cell death. The observation that positive section requires THEMIS (1-3), but not SOS proteins (27), and recent data that SOS1 is instead required for negative selection (29) agree with this model. A functional role of constitutive THEMIS-GRB2 association in thymocyte positive selection agrees with data on conditional ablation of GRB2 in thymocytes (30), which showed that GRB2-SH2 and -SH3C (required for association to THEMIS) were found to be indispensable for thymocyte development (30).…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…In agreement with this model, RasGRP1 without SOS sends ana-log ERK signals (10,12,25), ERK phosphorylation and positive selection are impaired in Rasgrp1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice (18), ERK1 and ERK2 doubly deficient thymocytes demonstrate impaired positive selection (27), and Grb2 haploinsufficiency (28) or conditional inactivation of Sos1 (29) in thymocytes leaves positive selection intact. However, recent studies have demonstrated that this model is incomplete; negative selection is intact in ERK1 Ϫ/Ϫ ERK2 Ϫ/Ϫ thymocytes (30) as well as in thymocytes with conditional inactivation of Sos1 (29), even in the context of SOS2 deletion (31).…”
Section: Tcr-induced Erk Phosphorylation Is Impaired In Rasgrp1mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…However, recent studies have demonstrated that this model is incomplete; negative selection is intact in ERK1 Ϫ/Ϫ ERK2 Ϫ/Ϫ thymocytes (30) as well as in thymocytes with conditional inactivation of Sos1 (29), even in the context of SOS2 deletion (31). Thus, TCR-induced digital ERK activation alone cannot be sufficient for the negative selection signal.…”
Section: Tcr-induced Erk Phosphorylation Is Impaired In Rasgrp1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data, in conjunction with the marked downregulation of Sos1 and upregulation of RasGRP1 protein levels observed between DN and DP thymocytes, have suggested an alternative model in which the RasGEF expression profile is the major determinant of Ras activation at these critical intrathymic checkpoints (12). A caveat to this second model is that genetic studies to date have not described a role for either Sos1 or RasGRP1 in negative selection (12,20). Therefore, whether Ras is involved in negative selection at the TCR checkpoint remains a critical, unanswered question.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%