2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.02.953745
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted high-resolution chromosome conformation capture at genome-wide scale

Abstract: 24Chromosome conformation capture (3C) provides an adaptable tool for studying diverse 25 biological questions. Current 3C methods provide either low-resolution interaction profiles 26 across the entire genome, or high-resolution interaction profiles at up to several hundred loci. 27All 3C methods are affected to varying degrees by inefficiency, bias and noise. As such, 28 generation of reproducible high-resolution interaction profiles has not been achieved at scale. 29To overcome this barrier, we systematical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ligation is not the only potential source of difference between the two methods, as GAM and Hi-C also make use of quite different fixation protocols. The choice of fixation protocol has been shown to affect the proportion of informative ligation events between different 3C experiments (Oudelaar et al, 2017), and it may also influence the contacts of genomic regions with different protein composition and/or compaction within a single experiment (Downes et al, 2020;Williamson et al, 2014). The digestion of nuclear chromatin necessary for preparing Hi-C libraries has also been shown to disrupt nuclear structure (Gavrilov et al, 2013), whereas GAM uses fixation protocols specifically chosen to maximize the preservation of nuclear architecture and retention of nuclear proteins (Guillot et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ligation is not the only potential source of difference between the two methods, as GAM and Hi-C also make use of quite different fixation protocols. The choice of fixation protocol has been shown to affect the proportion of informative ligation events between different 3C experiments (Oudelaar et al, 2017), and it may also influence the contacts of genomic regions with different protein composition and/or compaction within a single experiment (Downes et al, 2020;Williamson et al, 2014). The digestion of nuclear chromatin necessary for preparing Hi-C libraries has also been shown to disrupt nuclear structure (Gavrilov et al, 2013), whereas GAM uses fixation protocols specifically chosen to maximize the preservation of nuclear architecture and retention of nuclear proteins (Guillot et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the DpnII fragment coordinates were different in human (GRCh38) and chimpanzee (panTro6), we generated different probe sets for each genome. Each DpnII fragment initially contained 2 probes at either end, and then filtered for repeat content (BLAT density score < 40), GC content (< 60%) and duplicate sequences (<=2 duplicates) using the program Capsequm 107,108 . Final probe sequences were generated on these filtered fragments using the design tool at https://capsequm.molbiol.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/CapSequm.cgi and pooled custom biotinylated oligonucleotide probes for each species were ordered from Twist Biosciences Inc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NG Capture‐C method performs capture using DNA (rather than RNA) biotinylated oligos, introduces a second round of capture, and pools multiple independent 3C libraries for processing in a singular reaction, thus improving sensitivity and throughput. The latest iterations of Capture‐C design, Nuclear‐Titrated (NuTi) Capture‐C and Tiled‐C, further advance the resolution and efficacy of Capture‐C‐based methods (Downes et al, 2020 ; Oudelaar et al, 2020 ). NuTi Capture‐C isolates 3C libraries from intact nuclei by separating 3C libraries into nuclear and non‐nuclear fractions post‐ligation and utilizes shorter oligonucleotide probes (shortened from 120 to 50 bp).…”
Section: The Development Of Chromosome Conformation Capture Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%