2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted genome editing in pluripotent stem cells using zinc-finger nucleases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method would test the sufficiency of the mutation for disease, the necessity of the mutation for the disease behavior, and/or the response to molecularly targeted drugs, and correct key disease mutations in a cancer patientspecific iPS cell line. Currently existing genomic-editing tools in human pluripotent stem cells, e.g., zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and clustered regularly interspaced shored palindromic repeats (CRISPRs)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems, [67][68][69][70][71] could perform proofof-principle exercises to unambiguously elucidate the necessity and sufficiency of given mutations for given cancer disease phenotypes. This approach might be extremely valuable to assess the importance of genetic modifiers on cancer disease penetrance, i.e., whether a cancer mutation evokes a diseases phenotype in some cell lines but not in others.…”
Section: Precog-ips Cancer Cells Generation and Utilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method would test the sufficiency of the mutation for disease, the necessity of the mutation for the disease behavior, and/or the response to molecularly targeted drugs, and correct key disease mutations in a cancer patientspecific iPS cell line. Currently existing genomic-editing tools in human pluripotent stem cells, e.g., zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and clustered regularly interspaced shored palindromic repeats (CRISPRs)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems, [67][68][69][70][71] could perform proofof-principle exercises to unambiguously elucidate the necessity and sufficiency of given mutations for given cancer disease phenotypes. This approach might be extremely valuable to assess the importance of genetic modifiers on cancer disease penetrance, i.e., whether a cancer mutation evokes a diseases phenotype in some cell lines but not in others.…”
Section: Precog-ips Cancer Cells Generation and Utilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, ZFN pairs require extensive in vitro testing making them an expensive choice for genome editing. ZFN genome editing is more fully reviewed in [118,119].…”
Section: Creating Human Disease Models In Hipsc By Genome Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeted CFTR gene addition to the CCR5 safe harbor locus of the human genome Genetic engineering of hiPSCs using designed ZFNs or TALENs have been reported previously in literature employing hiPSCs generated by random integrations of pluripotency genes [21][22][23][24][25] using retroviral methods, rather than site-specific integration. ZFN-mediated approach, however, generates precisely targeted genetically well-defined hiPSCs, circumventing the problems associated with random integrations.…”
Section: Generation Of Hipscs From Human Lung Fibroblasts and Cbmncs mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZFN-mediated approach, however, generates precisely targeted genetically well-defined hiPSCs, circumventing the problems associated with random integrations. Targeting of selectable marker transgenes (like GFP or puromycin) to the IL2RG, PPP1R12C, AAVS1, and CCR5 loci have been described previously elsewhere [21,24,25].…”
Section: Generation Of Hipscs From Human Lung Fibroblasts and Cbmncs mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation