2017
DOI: 10.1111/ene.13250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted exomes reveal simultaneous MFN2 and GDAP1 mutations in a severe Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth disease type 2 phenotype

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we proposed a coordinated role of GDAP1 and MFN2 regulating MCSs with other organelles. Of note, in agreement with our proposal, it has been reported the rare coinheritance of GDAP1 and MFN2 pathogenic variants is associated with an accumulative effect on the observed phenotype ( Kostera-Pruszczyk et al, 2014 ; Anghelescu et al, 2017 ). Indeed, it has been described the digenic inheritance in patients carrying mutations in both genes ( Barreda Fierro et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, we proposed a coordinated role of GDAP1 and MFN2 regulating MCSs with other organelles. Of note, in agreement with our proposal, it has been reported the rare coinheritance of GDAP1 and MFN2 pathogenic variants is associated with an accumulative effect on the observed phenotype ( Kostera-Pruszczyk et al, 2014 ; Anghelescu et al, 2017 ). Indeed, it has been described the digenic inheritance in patients carrying mutations in both genes ( Barreda Fierro et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A population study of 787 patients with CMT identified at least 11 patients with multiple CMT subtypes (CMT1A/1E, CMT1E/1B, CMTX1/1B or CMT1A/1C), and as not all patients were tested for multiple variants, this percentage could be higher 11 . Other examples include the coexistence of the 17p duplication with two LITAF variants in a patient with severe CMT1 74 , and the presence of both MFN2 and GDAP1 variants in a patient with severe CMT2 75 . Furthermore, a recent retrospective analysis of 2,076 patients with a rare genetic diagnosis found that that 5% of patients had between two and four diagnoses 76 , suggesting that the cooccurrence of more than one independent genetic diagnosis in a single individual is more common than previously thought.…”
Section: Phenotype-genotype Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a Japanese cohort study identified 5 out of 1,005 families with CMT harboring coinherited variants, accounting for 0.5% (5/1,005) of the total, in which the "double trouble" effect of concomitant variants were the underlying causes (32). Compared with the "genetic modifier" effect of GDAP1 variants observed in this study, the coexistence of homozygous AR-CMT2K (p.Q163X) or heterozygous autosomal dominant-CMT2K (p.H123R, p.E222K, and p.R120W) variant in GDAP1 and heterozygous variant in MFN2 had been reported associating with a more severe phenotype, suggesting the "double trouble" effect of concomitant MFN2 and GDAP1 variants (28,30,33,34). Moreover, concomitant variants were also related to true digenic inheritance (DI) that has been defined as the coinheritance of two nonallelic mutations, both are indispensable to establish the diagnosis (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%