2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13039-019-0459-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted capture enrichment followed by NGS: development and validation of a single comprehensive NIPT for chromosomal aneuploidies, microdeletion syndromes and monogenic diseases

Abstract: Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been widely adopted for the detection of fetal aneuploidies and microdeletion syndromes, nevertheless, limited clinical utilization has been reported for the non-invasive prenatal screening of monogenic diseases. In this study, we present the development and validation of a single comprehensive NIPT for prenatal screening of chromosomal aneuploidies, microdeletions and 50 autosomal recessive disorders associated with severe or moderate clinical phenotype. Re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Koumbaris et al validated their NIPT using 2033 cell-free DNA samples in 2019 and found 27 positive cases for T13/T18/T21. The overall positive rate of their test is 1.32% (27/2033) [21]. Compared with this value, the positive rate of 0.39% in this study seems quite low.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Koumbaris et al validated their NIPT using 2033 cell-free DNA samples in 2019 and found 27 positive cases for T13/T18/T21. The overall positive rate of their test is 1.32% (27/2033) [21]. Compared with this value, the positive rate of 0.39% in this study seems quite low.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Recently, three studies reported targeted capture NIPT to screen for chromosome aneuploidy, copy number variation, and monogenic disease. [32][33][34] such as early pregnancies or certain aneuploidies. 2,,35 A recent study has demonstrated the importance of prenatal screening for genetically dominant disorders caused by de novo mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 31 However, these methods require experiments that cannot cope with conventional NIPT method for chromosome analysis. Recently, three studies reported targeted capture NIPT to screen for chromosome aneuploidy, copy number variation, and monogenic disease 32–34 . However, their methods were time‐consuming due to 16–72 hours of hybridization capture after the preparation of cfDNA sequencing library.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor prognosis, organ abnormalities, mental retardation, and growth retardation are the common features. [3][4][5] Prenatal diagnosis is based on providing genetic counseling for highrisk pregnant females, with further applications of modern biology, biochemistry, immunogenetics, cytogenetics, and molecular genetics techniques to perform maternal or embryo/fetal testing to achieve the diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. Traditionally, among the procedures of prenatal diagnosis, the most commonly used and effective method of prenatal diagnosis for fetuses in mid-term pregnancy is amniocentesis and karyotyping of amniotic fluid…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the traditional cytogenetic testing and analysis, the chromosome number abnormalities in genetic mutations include the polyploid and aneuploid. Chromosomal aneuploidy is the most common chromosomal disease, accounting for 80–90% of all chromosomal diseases, 4 and it is the main cause of birth defects. Different types of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy have different prognoses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%