2001
DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/47.12.2185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Target Values and Method Evaluation in Proficiency Testing Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of the degree of error, PT failures commonly have multiple or non-obvious sources. Compounding errors, e.g., calibration bias providing some portion of the inaccuracy and imprecision providing the remainder, or seemingly simple procedural deviations, such as not adequately mixing reagents, can be difficult to detect without systematic investigations [ 169 ].…”
Section: Pt Failuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the degree of error, PT failures commonly have multiple or non-obvious sources. Compounding errors, e.g., calibration bias providing some portion of the inaccuracy and imprecision providing the remainder, or seemingly simple procedural deviations, such as not adequately mixing reagents, can be difficult to detect without systematic investigations [ 169 ].…”
Section: Pt Failuresmentioning
confidence: 99%