2008
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2008.4526516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Target Localization from 3D data for On-Orbit Autonomous Rendezvous & Docking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…about 500 points in average, much less than typical applications based on detecting some thousands of points [32]. Regarding the noise parameters, the selected data (σ LOS ¼0.00071, σ RANGE ¼25 mm, and P O ¼ 5-7%) are relevant to a worst-case scenario since spaceborne LIDARs have typically better noise characteristics [28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…about 500 points in average, much less than typical applications based on detecting some thousands of points [32]. Regarding the noise parameters, the selected data (σ LOS ¼0.00071, σ RANGE ¼25 mm, and P O ¼ 5-7%) are relevant to a worst-case scenario since spaceborne LIDARs have typically better noise characteristics [28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a percentage of outlier (P O ) has been considered for each target component. The outliers are selected in the detected point cloud thanks to a random extraction from a uniform distribution and are characterized by a range uncertainty that is four times σ RANGE [28].…”
Section: Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovative computer vision algorithms developed in-house at Neptec allow this process to happen in real-time on TriDAR's embedded flight computer while achieving the necessary robustness and reliability expected for mission critical operations [4] [5]. Initialization of the tracking process is performed by automatic acquisition algorithms also developed in house at Neptec [8]. Fast data acquisition has been achieved by implementing a smart scanning strategy referred to as More Information Less Data (MILD) where only the necessary data to perform the pose estimation is acquired by the sensor.…”
Section: Tridar Relative Navigation Vision Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the monocular approaches, a possible solution is to build the database of images with a hierarchical structure in which similar views are clustered at the lower levels of the hierarchy [ 9 , 10 ]. A similar approach, in the case of 3D techniques, is adopted by the polygonal aspect hashing algorithm, which limits the search space to the set of poses that allow the reference model to have at least partial overlapping surfaces with the input data [ 11 ]. A different approach, specifically designed for elongated targets, is to reduce the size of the database by splitting the estimation of the pose parameters in two phases: firstly, the two angles which identify the target main axis are determined by exploiting the principal component analysis, and, secondly, a 3D binary TM algorithm is applied to a 4-DOF database to compute the remaining rotation parameter and the relative position vector [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%