IEE Colloquium on Motion Analysis and Tracking 1999
DOI: 10.1049/ic:19990585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Target identification in a complex maritime scene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detected change image was then analyzed to find if the changes correlate to the prediction of Bayesian background model [78] or are they likely to be foreground. The regions classified Relatively stationary pixels [17], [18], [37], [88][90] Temporal filter extracts statistical representative of background Sliding temporal window, change from reference, spatial smoothing Simple, computation efficient, online learning Cannot deal with highly dynamic backgrounds, e.g., wakes Spatio-temporal filtering approaches [22], [39], [40] Background is modelled as low spatial frequency component, albeit with temporal variation Sliding temporal window and fixed spatial window (blobs or neighborhood) are used for filter parameters' update Simple, online learning, computation efficient, robust to small dynamics and illumination variation Cannot deal with highly dynamic backgrounds, e.g., wakes GMM [12], [77] Intensities at a pixel as mixture of Gaussian distributions Multi-step approaches [13], [21] Combination of more than one technique More robust and versatile, often made adaptive and capable of dealing with wakes Complicated, computation intensive, slow due to frequent feedback -feed-forward steps as foreground were then used with color-based segmentation approach to further strengthen the foreground estimation and thus contribute to more robust background detection. The background thus determined was used to update the reference stationary image and the Bayesian background model.…”
Section: Dynamic Background Subtractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detected change image was then analyzed to find if the changes correlate to the prediction of Bayesian background model [78] or are they likely to be foreground. The regions classified Relatively stationary pixels [17], [18], [37], [88][90] Temporal filter extracts statistical representative of background Sliding temporal window, change from reference, spatial smoothing Simple, computation efficient, online learning Cannot deal with highly dynamic backgrounds, e.g., wakes Spatio-temporal filtering approaches [22], [39], [40] Background is modelled as low spatial frequency component, albeit with temporal variation Sliding temporal window and fixed spatial window (blobs or neighborhood) are used for filter parameters' update Simple, online learning, computation efficient, robust to small dynamics and illumination variation Cannot deal with highly dynamic backgrounds, e.g., wakes GMM [12], [77] Intensities at a pixel as mixture of Gaussian distributions Multi-step approaches [13], [21] Combination of more than one technique More robust and versatile, often made adaptive and capable of dealing with wakes Complicated, computation intensive, slow due to frequent feedback -feed-forward steps as foreground were then used with color-based segmentation approach to further strengthen the foreground estimation and thus contribute to more robust background detection. The background thus determined was used to update the reference stationary image and the Bayesian background model.…”
Section: Dynamic Background Subtractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this direction, Voles et al [29] proposed a method for object detection based on anisotropic diffusion, which however presents high computational cost and performs well only for horizontal and vertical edges. In [30] is presented a method that fuses a foreground object detection technique with image color segmentation to improve accuracy.…”
Section: Maritime Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method often results in imprecise segmentation results. Voles et al [21] improve the method presented in [20] by adding motion information obtained using frame differencing; the algorithm designed is purely pixel-based and therefore fails to segment larger maritime objects.…”
Section: Traditional Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%