2019
DOI: 10.1002/prot.25805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Target highlights in CASP13: Experimental target structures through the eyes of their authors

Abstract: The functional and biological significance of selected CASP13 targets are described by the authors of the structures. The structural biologists discuss the most interesting structural features of the target proteins and assess whether these features were correctly reproduced in the predictions submitted to the CASP13 experiment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(229 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the results in terms of more accurate models are not impressive, it is clear that much more development is possible, and we have already seen several groups introduce methods specifically tailored to particular data types. CASP continues to investigate the best ways of assessing how effectively functional information can be derived from models, and in this round, solicited assessment comments from those who provided the prediction targets . An interesting development during CASP13 was the introduction of a CASP commons experiment (http://predictioncenter.org/caspcommons/).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the results in terms of more accurate models are not impressive, it is clear that much more development is possible, and we have already seen several groups introduce methods specifically tailored to particular data types. CASP continues to investigate the best ways of assessing how effectively functional information can be derived from models, and in this round, solicited assessment comments from those who provided the prediction targets . An interesting development during CASP13 was the introduction of a CASP commons experiment (http://predictioncenter.org/caspcommons/).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CASP continues to investigate the best ways of assessing how effectively functional information can be derived from models, 42,43 and in this round, solicited assessment comments from those who provided the prediction targets. 44 An interesting development during CASP13 was the introduction of a CASP commons experiment (http:// predictioncenter.org/caspcommons/). Biologists were canvased to identify a total of 35 small proteins for which structure would be particularly useful for their research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous model was critical in designing mutations and experiments that ultimately resulted in the high-resolution structures presented herein. Nevertheless, this highlights the continued need for high-resolution experimental structure determination, particularly in the case of coiled-coil and hetero-oligomeric structures, which remain beyond the reaches of in silico structure prediction methods, despite advances in our understanding of protein folding and the increasing accuracy in predicting novel folds of monomers and homo-oligomers (Lepore et al, 2019, Callaway, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The T1 domain binds to the GABA B2 subunit, while the H1 domain binds to the Gβ subunit of the guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G-protein) ( Schwenk et al, 2010 ; Turecek et al, 2014 ; Zheng et al, 2019 ). X-ray crystallography of the T1 and H1 domains of KCTD12 and KCTD16 ( Lepore et al, 2019 ; Zheng et al, 2019 ; Zuo et al, 2019 ) revealed that the secondary and tertiary protein structures of those domains are highly conserved in the KCTD proteins. However, the T1 domain possesses a highly divergent loop between helix α2 and strand β3 (following the nomenclature from Zuo et al, 2019 ), while the H1 domain features a divergent loop between the strands β4 and β5 (following the nomenclature from Zheng et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%