2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2011.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Target–drug interactions: first principles and their application to drug discovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is by now well-recognized that one of the most pertinent factors for sustained drug efficacy and safety is not just its affinity, but possibly even more so, the mean lifetime of the protein-ligand complex (1)(2)(3). The latter property is strictly related to the time during which the ligand remains in the binding site (1,2), and is typically expressed by its inverse, the dissociation rate k off (2). In principle k off should be amenable to calculations through all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is by now well-recognized that one of the most pertinent factors for sustained drug efficacy and safety is not just its affinity, but possibly even more so, the mean lifetime of the protein-ligand complex (1)(2)(3). The latter property is strictly related to the time during which the ligand remains in the binding site (1,2), and is typically expressed by its inverse, the dissociation rate k off (2). In principle k off should be amenable to calculations through all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with the most modern purpose-built supercomputers or massive distributed computing, one can barely reach the timescale of milliseconds (3). Unfortunately most of the reported ligand-protein dissociation times far exceed this timescale (2). These timescales can be reached either by transition path sampling methods (8,9), quasiclassical approximations (10), by the construction of Markov state models (11,12), or through carefully designed enhanced sampling methods (8,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) that make accessible the timescale of seconds and beyond in a controlled and accurate way.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, replacement of the octanol component by artificial phospholipid bilayer systems or even by biological membranes is justified. Recently, K p values obtained in this manner were used as a 'correction factor' to understand better the potential contribution of the membrane to the binding of bronchodilators and of other β 2 -adrenoreceptor ligands to this receptor [21].Participation of the membrane in the binding process A popular strategy in medicinal chemistry is to add hydrophobic functional groups to the skeleton of a lead compound [39], largely because drug molecules in solution are enclosed by an organized network of water molecules. When a drug is hydrophobic, removal of those water molecules (which is also denoted as 'desolvation') during the binding process provides a substantial contribution to the affinity of the drug [40,41].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slowly dissociating antagonist compounds give a higher receptor occupancy due to their increased residence time, so the wash step which effectively removes any unbound ligand will favour slowly dissociating compounds. [24][25][26] Despite the higher potency of the quinoline 27, the lower calculated logP of the 3-pyridyl derivative 35 yielded a compound with a higher LiPE value than the quinoline, suggesting that it was likely to be a better 'drug-like' candidate based on its calculated physicochemical properties. Furthermore, the calculated pharmacokinetic properties of 35 were predominantly within the recommended values as suggested by Schrödinger, and with similar values to 95% of known drugs ( Table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%