2013
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syt061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Target Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing of Ultraconserved Elements for Comparative Studies at Shallow Evolutionary Time Scales

Abstract: Comparative genetic studies of non-model organisms are transforming rapidly due to major advances in sequencing technology. A limiting factor in these studies has been the identification and screening of orthologous loci across an evolutionarily distant set of taxa. Here, we evaluate the efficacy of genomic markers targeting ultraconserved DNA elements (UCEs) for analyses at shallow evolutionary timescales. Using sequence capture and massively parallel sequencing to generate UCE data for five co-distributed Ne… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
275
3
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 307 publications
(292 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
11
275
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3). This mirrors the pattern found in several studies that had evaluated posterior variances as a function of the number of subsampled loci (Jennings and Edwards 2005;Lee and Edwards 2008;Smith et al 2013). To our knowledge, this is the first time two independent data sets of drastically different numbers of loci (fivefold difference) have been compared to show the benefits of larger numbers of independent loci in phylogenomic studies.…”
Section: Benefits Of Hundreds or More Of Independent Neutral Locisupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3). This mirrors the pattern found in several studies that had evaluated posterior variances as a function of the number of subsampled loci (Jennings and Edwards 2005;Lee and Edwards 2008;Smith et al 2013). To our knowledge, this is the first time two independent data sets of drastically different numbers of loci (fivefold difference) have been compared to show the benefits of larger numbers of independent loci in phylogenomic studies.…”
Section: Benefits Of Hundreds or More Of Independent Neutral Locisupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In studies of recently diverged populations or species, the researcher should use more variable markers such as ALs (Chen and Li 2001;Yang 2002;Rannala and Yang 2003;Jennings and Edwards 2005;Lee and Edwards 2008;Thomson et al 2010;Bertozzi et al 2012; or introns (Li et al 2010; Thomson et al 2010). Because the flanking sequences of AE and UCE loci tend to exhibit much variation, these loci may also perform well in studies involving recent divergences Smith et al 2013). However, for studies involving deep divergences spanning tens or hundreds of millions of years, the researcher must resort to highly conserved loci such as conserved exons (Li et al 2007; Thomson et al 2010), AE loci , or UCE loci .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A phylogenomic approach targeting thousands of independently evolved nuclear loci may be the only way to assess the current taxonomy of this group, and dissect the roles of hybridization and introgression in the origin and rapid diversification of this insular lineage. Phylogenomic methods based on markers identified from, e.g., restriction site associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) (Cruaud et al, 2014;Eaton and Ree, 2013;Smith et al, 2014), targeted enrichment of ultraconserved elements (UCEs) or conserved ortholog sequences (COS) (Mandel et al, 2014;Smith et al, 2014), and RNA-Seq (Wen et al, 2013;Wickett et al, 2014) could be suitable methods to resolve Hawaiian mint relationships. However, these approaches are also associated with challenges, including accurately inferring orthology in high polyploid plants, slow mutation rates in exonic regions, which may be too low to resolve recent radiations (Giarla and Esselstyn, 2015), and the need to obtaining high quality RNA and DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We mapped alleles onto the species tree based on the sampled populations in Zink et al (2013) and included 1 Black-tailed Gnatcatcher (P. melanura) as an outgroup. In taxa in which discrete units exist despite a shallow evolutionary scale, populations can be used as terminals for species tree estimation (Smith et al 2014). We included all data used by Zink et al (2013) with the same settings as for their extended Bayesian skyline plot, but excluded the locus beta-Fibrinogen Intron 7 (see McCormack and Maley [2015]).…”
Section: Appendix Methods Used To Create a Multilocus Lineage Tree Fomentioning
confidence: 99%