Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.1002/9783527633326.ch16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Target‐Based Virtual Screening to Address Protein–Protein Interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 However, the most prevalent method, HTS, gives disappointing hit-rates relative to the cost and time expenditures involved, even if it is augmented by computational simulations based on matching virtual libraries with structural and physiochemical descriptors. 7,8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 However, the most prevalent method, HTS, gives disappointing hit-rates relative to the cost and time expenditures involved, even if it is augmented by computational simulations based on matching virtual libraries with structural and physiochemical descriptors. 7,8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 However, the most prevalent method, HTS, gives disappointing hit rates relative to the cost and time expenditures involved, even if it is augmented by computational simulations based on matching virtual libraries with structural and physiochemical descriptors. 7,8 Compound libraries for HTS assembled to find small molecules that bind enzyme active sites, ion channels, and G protein-coupled receptors, and filtered for predicted oral bioavailabilities, 9,10 may not be suitable for PPI targets; it has been suggested this is one reason for the poor hit rates. 11 Despite this, there is no widely accepted notion of preferred small molecule chemotypes for these targets, except for small molecule mimics of ideal interface secondary structures.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The six C α– C β coordinates of the preferred conformations were also overlaid on a huge database (>250k) of side‐chains on crystallographically characterized PPI interfaces (Exploring Key Orientations, EKO, see reference for details). Chemotype 1 has preferred conformations that overlay more often on secondary structures (rather than on regions that have no discernible secondary structures) than most of the minimalist mimics analyzed in a previous study.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…High throughput screening, for instance, has been used oen for discovery of small molecules, but tends to give disappointing hit-rates relative to the cost and time expenditures involved. [35][36][37][38] The following argument can be made that resistance to MLN4924 is more likely than it would be for a small molecule that perturbs the NEDD8$NAE protein-protein interaction (PPI). Only non-extensive mutations are required to block pharmaceuticals binding nucleotide triphosphate binding sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High throughput screening, for instance, has been used often for discovery of small molecules, but tends to give disappointing hit-rates relative to the cost and time expenditures involved. 35–38…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%