2005
DOI: 10.1364/ao.44.007055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Target-acquisition performance in undersampled infrared imagers: static imagery to motion video

Abstract: In this research we show that the target-acquisition performance of an undersampled imager improves with sensor or target motion. We provide an experiment designed to evaluate the improvement in observer performance as a function of target motion rate in the video. We created the target motion by mounting a thermal imager on a precision two-axis gimbal and varying the sensor motion rate from 0.25 to 1 instantaneous field of view per frame. A midwave thermal imager was used to permit short integration times and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are in agreement with the general finding [3][4][5][6][7][8] that motion with under-sampled cameras can significantly increase observer performance and at the same time provide a quantitative explanation for the marginal performance difference between the identification of hand-held objects in static and dynamic imagery reported by Beintema et al 9 As explained, the latter is the only study performed with an uncooled thermal imager moving at a speed of 0.57 pixel∕ frame, hence the results are considerably affected by detector smear.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The results are in agreement with the general finding [3][4][5][6][7][8] that motion with under-sampled cameras can significantly increase observer performance and at the same time provide a quantitative explanation for the marginal performance difference between the identification of hand-held objects in static and dynamic imagery reported by Beintema et al 9 As explained, the latter is the only study performed with an uncooled thermal imager moving at a speed of 0.57 pixel∕ frame, hence the results are considerably affected by detector smear.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Indeed, some motion smear was visible on individual images. Krapels 25 used a similar speed but with a cooled MWIR camera that did not induce smear. We found little influence of playing back motion at lower speed, suggesting that motion smear on the recordings may have been the primary factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus strictly these data may not be used as a validation of NVThermIP. Effects of motion and DSR on under-sampled uncooled thermal imagery are studied in both laboratory and field 25,26,27 , but most are on the TOD triangle laboratory test pattern and not on realistic targets. Recently, one study has been reported on IR system field performance with super-resolution 28 , using a tank target set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our approach avoids any explicit reconstruction and relies on perceptual processes to ensure detail enhancement. Krapels et al [2005] as well as Bijl et al [2006] reported better object discrimination for subpixel camera panning than for corresponding static frames. Object discrimination improved regardless of the subpixel sensor motion rate, except for critical velocities [Tekalp 1995, C. 13] such as a one-pixel shift.…”
Section: Optimal Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 93%