2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf02914056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TaqMan real-time PCR versus four conventional PCR assays for detection of apple proliferation phytoplasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…P. mali' in inoculated apple trees that did not show visible disease symptoms until October 2009, root samples were collected for DNA extraction. DNA was isolated from 100 mg dissected phloem tissue using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) (Baric et al 2006) and tested with a highly sensitive real-time PCR method (Baric & Dalla Via 2004). Infected trees treated with Dormex and the corresponding infected control trees were sampled in July and October 2009 as well as in July and October 2010 in order to be tested for an effect of cyanamide treatment on the phytoplasma titre.…”
Section: Biomass Of Symptomatic Vs Non-infected Apple Plantletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P. mali' in inoculated apple trees that did not show visible disease symptoms until October 2009, root samples were collected for DNA extraction. DNA was isolated from 100 mg dissected phloem tissue using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) (Baric et al 2006) and tested with a highly sensitive real-time PCR method (Baric & Dalla Via 2004). Infected trees treated with Dormex and the corresponding infected control trees were sampled in July and October 2009 as well as in July and October 2010 in order to be tested for an effect of cyanamide treatment on the phytoplasma titre.…”
Section: Biomass Of Symptomatic Vs Non-infected Apple Plantletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR with primer pair AP5/AP4 was found to be the least costly test assay. As real-time PCR assay has a high potential for automation, it may be more suitable for large-scale routine diagnosis of AP disease (Baric et al 2006).…”
Section: Real-time Polymerase Chain Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that the qPCR-based method can detect the pathogen in artificial and natural latent brown rot infections. Many authors have reported that qPCR has a higher sensitivity and test specificity than conventional PCR for detecting and quantifying the DNA of soilborne fungi, oomycetes, bacteria, nematodes, viruses, and phytoplasmas (Baric et al, 2006;Ippolito et al, 2004;Lievens et al, 2006;Schena et al, 2004;. PCR-based methods are also considered the most effective method for detecting infectious microorganisms with a low titer and an uneven distribution in plants, such as apple proliferation phytoplasma (Baric et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have reported that qPCR has a higher sensitivity and test specificity than conventional PCR for detecting and quantifying the DNA of soilborne fungi, oomycetes, bacteria, nematodes, viruses, and phytoplasmas (Baric et al, 2006;Ippolito et al, 2004;Lievens et al, 2006;Schena et al, 2004;. PCR-based methods are also considered the most effective method for detecting infectious microorganisms with a low titer and an uneven distribution in plants, such as apple proliferation phytoplasma (Baric et al, 2006). Moreover, cross detection of M. fructigena and M. laxa was found when using the P_fc probe on this study and an additional allelic discrimination step had to be added to distinguish between M. fructicola and M. fructigena/ M. laxa while van Brouwershaven et al (2010) did not detect any cross identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation