2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.05.24.445520
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tapping into non-English-language science for the conservation of global biodiversity

Abstract: The widely held assumption that any important scientific information would be available in English underlies the underuse of non-English-language science across disciplines. However, non-English-language science is expected to bring unique and valuable scientific information, especially in disciplines where the evidence is patchy, and for emergent issues where synthesising available evidence is an urgent challenge. Yet such contribution of non-English-language science to scientific communities and the applicat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the majority of brood parasitism publications resulting from work conducted in North America and Europe (Figures 2, 3b; Table S4), this geographic bias is similar to that seen in the wider ecology literature (Amano et al, 2021;Martin et al, 2012;Nuñez et al, 2019Nuñez et al, , 2021. Furthermore, we found that once a field site was established, it often became the subject of further brood parasitism studies (Figure 2).…”
Section: Patterns Of Past Researchsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…With the majority of brood parasitism publications resulting from work conducted in North America and Europe (Figures 2, 3b; Table S4), this geographic bias is similar to that seen in the wider ecology literature (Amano et al, 2021;Martin et al, 2012;Nuñez et al, 2019Nuñez et al, , 2021. Furthermore, we found that once a field site was established, it often became the subject of further brood parasitism studies (Figure 2).…”
Section: Patterns Of Past Researchsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…It is estimated that up to one‐third of articles in conservation biology are published in languages other than English (Amano et al, 2016) and that ignoring this literature could bias understanding (Amano et al, 2021; Konno et al, 2020). Systematically excluding studies by searching only in English can change the conclusions of syntheses and bias results towards developed regions, especially North America and Europe, that do not represent global trends.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example a recent special issue regarding the Lower Mekong basin included no articles examining freshwater turtles (with 20 published articles, https://www.mdpi.com/journal/water/special_issues/Mekong_River#published, accessed 8 September 2021). The inclusion of the Conservation Evidence database with its comprehensive coverage of both English and non-English language literature increases confidence that the geographic patterns are most likely a result of lack of documented evidence and not language based search bias (Amano et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%