2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2014.11.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taphonomy and morphology of the Ediacara form genus Aspidella

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
76
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(6 reference statements)
2
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to their single peripheral rim, without ornamentation, elliptical fossils from Saint‐Gonlay clearly differ from typical Ediacaran discoid fossils such as Aspidella , Cyclomedusa, Marsonia and Medusinites which show strong concentric lines or radial structures (Wade ; McCall ; McGabhann ; Kumar & Ahmad ; Tarhan et al . ) or other various discoid and concentric megascopic fossils such as the ones discovered in the Precambrian of Canada (Burzynski & Narbonne ) or China (Zhang et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to their single peripheral rim, without ornamentation, elliptical fossils from Saint‐Gonlay clearly differ from typical Ediacaran discoid fossils such as Aspidella , Cyclomedusa, Marsonia and Medusinites which show strong concentric lines or radial structures (Wade ; McCall ; McGabhann ; Kumar & Ahmad ; Tarhan et al . ) or other various discoid and concentric megascopic fossils such as the ones discovered in the Precambrian of Canada (Burzynski & Narbonne ) or China (Zhang et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to their single peripheral rim, without ornamentation, elliptical fossils from Saint-Gonlay clearly differ from typical Ediacaran discoid fossils such as Aspidella, Cyclomedusa, Marsonia and Medusinites which show strong concentric lines or radial structures (Wade 1972;McCall 2006;McGabhann 2007;Kumar & Ahmad 2012;Tarhan et al 2015) or other various discoid and concentric megascopic fossils such as the ones discovered in the Precambrian of Canada (Burzynski & Narbonne 2015) or China (Zhang et al 2006). The low thickness and the peripheral bulge argue against an affinity with the circular Intrites punctatus from the Neoproterozoic in the U.K., where the central deep depression is lacking (McIlroy et al 2005;Liu 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the base of each parasequence, the Flat‐Laminated to Linguoid‐Rippled Sandstone Facies (formerly described as the Delta‐Front Sandstone Facies; cf. Gehling & Droser, ) consists of fining‐ and thinning‐upward sets of poorly sorted, laminated, red silty sandstone beds, along which linguoid ripples and tool marks occur, with fossils occurring primarily in hyporelief as external and entrained composite molds, and occasionally in epirelief (Droser et al., ; Tarhan, Droser, Gehling, & Dzaugis, ). The Oscillation‐Rippled Sandstone Facies (formerly described as the Wave‐Base Sandstone Facies; cf.…”
Section: Geologic Setting and Sample Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only broadly accepted evidence of motility and associated behaviours in the Ediacara biota is represented by trace fossils from Canada, China, Namibia, Russia, and South Australia23456. Previous attempts to compare Ediacara disc-shaped fossils (e.g., Aspidella ) with free-swimming medusoids have been discounted in light of evidence that these were either attachment discs for frond-like organisms7 or a motile, benthic animal of cnidarian grade8. Serial imprints left by flat organisms such as Dickinsonia and Yorgia have been previously interpreted as multiple decayed organisms or touch-down impressions made by current-shuffled individuals, but they are likely evidence of periodic creeping to feed via adsorption of mat nutrients910111213.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%