2011
DOI: 10.3390/molecules16021240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tannin Fingerprinting in Vegetable Tanned Leather by Solid State NMR Spectroscopy and Comparison with Leathers Tanned by Other Processes

Abstract: Solid state 13 C-NMR spectra of pure tannin powders from four different sources -mimosa, quebracho, chestnut and tara -are readily distinguishable from each other, both in pure commercial powder form, and in leather which they have been used to tan. Groups of signals indicative of the source, and type (condensed vs. hydrolyzable) of tannin used in the manufacture are well resolved in the spectra of the finished leathers. These fingerprints are compared with those arising from leathers tanned with other common … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
19
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(39 reference statements)
4
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure S4 shows 13 CC PMASNMR spectra recorded from pristine TA (TA ref ), TA prec ,a sw ell as oxidized TA (TA ox ), which was formed in aS i-free buffer solution at pH = 7.8. [21] The main distinction is the emergence of ar esonance at % 150 ppm in the 13 CNMR spectrum of TA prec that is attributed to 13 CÀOÀSi fragments based on the 13 Cs hift [22] and our 13 C{ 29 Si REDORN MR results (Figure S3, Supporting Information). [21] The main distinction is the emergence of ar esonance at % 150 ppm in the 13 CNMR spectrum of TA prec that is attributed to 13 CÀOÀSi fragments based on the 13 Cs hift [22] and our 13 C{ 29 Si REDORN MR results (Figure S3, Supporting Information).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure S4 shows 13 CC PMASNMR spectra recorded from pristine TA (TA ref ), TA prec ,a sw ell as oxidized TA (TA ox ), which was formed in aS i-free buffer solution at pH = 7.8. [21] The main distinction is the emergence of ar esonance at % 150 ppm in the 13 CNMR spectrum of TA prec that is attributed to 13 CÀOÀSi fragments based on the 13 Cs hift [22] and our 13 C{ 29 Si REDORN MR results (Figure S3, Supporting Information). [21] The main distinction is the emergence of ar esonance at % 150 ppm in the 13 CNMR spectrum of TA prec that is attributed to 13 CÀOÀSi fragments based on the 13 Cs hift [22] and our 13 C{ 29 Si REDORN MR results (Figure S3, Supporting Information).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The NMR responses from TA prec and TA ref are similar, in which the latter accords with ap revious report. The 13 CNMR peaks between 50 ppm and 80 ppm stem from the central glucose ring, [21] indicatinga no verall intact structure of TA upon its complexation with Si. The 13 CNMR peaks between 50 ppm and 80 ppm stem from the central glucose ring, [21] indicatinga no verall intact structure of TA upon its complexation with Si.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the structural complexity and diversity and the similarity of properties of compounds within this group, the study of PAs and their structural elucidation is a difficult task. Several analytical methods [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] have been proposed or are currently developed and employed for quantification and separation of PA compounds: NMR analysis, mass spectrometry-fast-atom bombardment (FAB), electrospray ionization (ESI), liquid secondary ion (LSI), matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF)), size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), normal phase and counter-current chromatography etc. All these methods are potentially useful for condensed tannins characterization and they have practical advantages but also disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible to evidence a marked sharpening of some signals, especially those at 175 ppm which correspond to amide carbon signals, esters, and carboxylate carbons. Considering that in solid NMR a cause of signal broadening is molecular disorder and environmental heterogeneity, the signal sharpening observed could be attributed to the covalent bonding of DDSA residues which create a more ordered polymer (Romer et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%