2011
DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2010.482550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tangent Cone of Numerical Semigroup Rings of Embedding Dimension Three

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we give new characterizations of the Buchsbaum and Cohen-Macaulay properties of the tangent cone gr m (R), where (R, m) is a numerical semigroup ring of embedding dimension 3. In particular, we confirm the conjectures raised by Sapko on the Buchsbaumness of gr m (R).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(30 reference statements)
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown by Heinzer and Swanson (2008, Theorem 5.10) that g(a 1 ) = τ if ν = 2. On the other hand, S =< 7, 11, 20 > and S =< 11, 14, 21 > are examples due to Shen (2008) of semigroups for which τ < g(a i ) for all i. Notice that the latter is symmetric and M-additive.…”
Section: The Minimal Goto Number Of a Numerical Semigroup Ringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown by Heinzer and Swanson (2008, Theorem 5.10) that g(a 1 ) = τ if ν = 2. On the other hand, S =< 7, 11, 20 > and S =< 11, 14, 21 > are examples due to Shen (2008) of semigroups for which τ < g(a i ) for all i. Notice that the latter is symmetric and M-additive.…”
Section: The Minimal Goto Number Of a Numerical Semigroup Ringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we give conditions for the Cohen-Macaulayness of the tangent cone. For some recent and past activity about the tangent cone of C S , see [1,2,10,23,34,35].…”
Section: Cohen-macaulayness Of the Tangent Conementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 3.1. If R is a Gorenstein numerical semigroup ring, then [9,Lemma 2.5] shows that N a1 = ord(f (H) + a 1 ) + 1. A direct computation, which we omit here, similar in difficulty and length to the proof of Theorem 2.2, shows that when edim(R) = 3 we have N ai = ord(f (H) + a j ) + 1 for all 1 ≤ j ≤ 3.…”
Section: The Index Of a Complete Intersection Semigroup Ring Of Edim >3mentioning
confidence: 99%