2016
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2015.2508660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TanDEM-X for Large-Area Modeling of Urban Vegetation Height: Evidence from Berlin, Germany

Abstract: Large-area urban ecology studies often miss information on vertical parameters of vegetation, even though they represent important constituting properties of complex urban ecosystems. The new globally available digital elevation model (DEM) of the spaceborne TanDEM-X mission has an unprecedented spatial resolution (12 × 12 m) that allows us to derive such relevant information. So far, suitable approaches using a TanDEM-X DEM for the derivation of a normalized canopy model (nCM) are largely absent. Therefore, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison reveals an underestimation of mean heights for the total vegetation, and for trees as well (TanDEM-X CHM: 10.46 m; validation CHM: 12.02 m; TanDEM-X CHM for trees: 13.17 m; validation CHM for trees: 15.40 m). In comparison to an earlier study on urban vegetation height assessment [35], the results could be significantly improved (for the earlier study: mean height of 6.66 m for total vegetation in a subset of~70 km 2 ). Contrarily, the mean height for bushes/shrubs from the TanDEM-X CHM is larger than the validation height with 2.90 compared to 2.29 m. The distribution of the quantiles for CHMs for the total vegetation and trees indicates a constant offset to the validation heights, with similar deviations of the 50% and 75% quantiles (~2.25 m).…”
Section: Accuracy Assessment Of Vegetation Heightsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The comparison reveals an underestimation of mean heights for the total vegetation, and for trees as well (TanDEM-X CHM: 10.46 m; validation CHM: 12.02 m; TanDEM-X CHM for trees: 13.17 m; validation CHM for trees: 15.40 m). In comparison to an earlier study on urban vegetation height assessment [35], the results could be significantly improved (for the earlier study: mean height of 6.66 m for total vegetation in a subset of~70 km 2 ). Contrarily, the mean height for bushes/shrubs from the TanDEM-X CHM is larger than the validation height with 2.90 compared to 2.29 m. The distribution of the quantiles for CHMs for the total vegetation and trees indicates a constant offset to the validation heights, with similar deviations of the 50% and 75% quantiles (~2.25 m).…”
Section: Accuracy Assessment Of Vegetation Heightsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…A pre-processed TanDEM-X IDEM was available for this study from a former approach [35] where the following steps had been applied: (a) conversion from ellipsoidal to orthometric heights to enable data integration, and (b) removal of random errors by water masking including the biotope map and a provided height error mask followed by local outlier detection using a method of Breunig [46]) was available for this study. The IDEM is a product derived from acquisitions from the first coverage with one baseline configuration only and thus does not profit from dual-/multiple-baseline techniques and incidence angles.…”
Section: Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations