2006
DOI: 10.1556/crc.34.2006.2-3.236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tan spot of wheat caused byDrechslera tritici-repentis: Detection, transmission, and control in wheat seed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the interaction between the factors methods and varieties was not significant. Similar results were reported by Carmona et al. (1999, 2006) for other fungi belonging to the Dematiaceae family, such as Drechslera teres (Sacc).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, the interaction between the factors methods and varieties was not significant. Similar results were reported by Carmona et al. (1999, 2006) for other fungi belonging to the Dematiaceae family, such as Drechslera teres (Sacc).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this study, we established a maximum rate of seed transmission efficacy of 18.8% under field conditions. Both similar and higher rates of seed transmission have been reported for other leaf spots of cereals such as Drechslera avenae (Carmona et al 1999;Carmona et al 2004) and D. tritici-repentis (Carmona et al 2006;Schilder and Bergstrom 1992). Several factors are known to influence seed to crop infection, such as the number of infected seeds brought into the soil, the seeding rate, and the edaphic and climatic conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Compared with the untreated control, difenoconazole 15FS (the main ingredient of Dividend XL RTA in our study) did not increase wheat stand but increased grain yield (da Luz, 2003). In a study on the effectiveness of fungicide treatments on transmission of P. tritici-repentis to the wheat plumule, Carmona et al (2006) determined that in relation to the untreated control, iprodione (Rovral 50%) + triticonazole (Premis 2.5%) provided 71% control and difenoconazole (Dividend 3%) 36%, while tebuconazole (Raxil 2%) provided 14%. The latter results do not agree with our observations that products containing tebuconazole (Raxil MD and Raxil T) were more effective than Dividend XL RTA in improving the performance of plants derived from infected durum wheat seed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving seedling vigour and plant stand is important to reduce the damage caused by P. tritici-repentis under less than optimal growing conditions, such as has occurred in Saskatchewan for most of the past decade (Environment Canada, 2009). A significant improvement in seedling emergence and grain yield, or reduced transmission of P. tritici-repentis, was previously reported in common wheat with the use of selected fungicide seed treatments (da Luz, 2003;Krzyzinska et al, 2005;Carmona et al, 2006). The effect of fungicide seed treatments currently registered in Canada on P. tritici-repentis-infected durum wheat seed is not known, and no claims regarding this disease have been made for any of these products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%