2007
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2007.4378975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tamper Detection Based on Regularity of Wavelet Transform Coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method uses artifacts introduced into an image's histogram during the enhancement operations. Yagiz Sutcu et al [127] proposed a forgery detection method based on regularity properties of wavelet coefficients used for estimating sharpness and blurriness of edges. Xin Wang et al [137] proposed an image forgery detection based on the consistency of defocus blur.…”
Section: Blur and Sharpeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method uses artifacts introduced into an image's histogram during the enhancement operations. Yagiz Sutcu et al [127] proposed a forgery detection method based on regularity properties of wavelet coefficients used for estimating sharpness and blurriness of edges. Xin Wang et al [137] proposed an image forgery detection based on the consistency of defocus blur.…”
Section: Blur and Sharpeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These limitations include dependency to image format, sensi tivity to spliced region size and spatial alignment, sensitivity to lightning, dependency to the size of objects and dependency to camera type. (2) Our proposed approach has the ability to distinguish a wide range of blur degrees applicable for image splicing detection. (3) Our proposed approach can detect image splicing in high blur degree images with higher performance than the previous approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some works [10][11][12][13][14] have been proposed for image tampering detection based on blur degree inconsistency. However, these methods can not detect blur type inconsistency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%