2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tamm Review: Shifting global fire regimes: Lessons from reburns and research needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
147
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
5
147
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the highest fire treatment (10X burn period, 11.5X area burned), the study area burned with a fire rotation interval of 23 years, versus 250 years under the simulated contemporary rate of burning. https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss4/art12/ Averaged over the different vegetation types, area burned more than 10 years prior did not significantly affect the area burned in a given simulation, a result that is within the range of longevity (2 to 23 years) reported in a recent review (Prichard et al 2017). Negative fire feedbacks were slightly moderated by longer-term positive feedbacks, in which the effect of prior area burned diminished during the simulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the highest fire treatment (10X burn period, 11.5X area burned), the study area burned with a fire rotation interval of 23 years, versus 250 years under the simulated contemporary rate of burning. https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss4/art12/ Averaged over the different vegetation types, area burned more than 10 years prior did not significantly affect the area burned in a given simulation, a result that is within the range of longevity (2 to 23 years) reported in a recent review (Prichard et al 2017). Negative fire feedbacks were slightly moderated by longer-term positive feedbacks, in which the effect of prior area burned diminished during the simulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Despite these and other studies of fire on fire feedbacks (reviewed in Prichard et al 2017), a mechanistic typology to disentangle underlying processes that generate both positive and negative feedbacks could help organize existing knowledge and the design of future studies. For instance, Pritchard et al (2017) tabulated four metrics that describe potential outcomes from fire-on-fire interactions that could be further expanded by considering spatial mechanisms by which these effects are manifested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holsinger et al 2016, Prichard et al 2017, likely an outcome of top-down climatic controls on productivity, vegetation, and fire regime characteristics Moritz 2011, Pausas andRibeiro 2013). Holsinger et al 2016, Prichard et al 2017, likely an outcome of top-down climatic controls on productivity, vegetation, and fire regime characteristics Moritz 2011, Pausas andRibeiro 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have highlighted the lack of knowledge of long term ecosystem responses to wildfire, and especially in semi-arid ecosystems (Prichard et al, 2017;Miller et al, 2013). Long term studies on wildfire responses are difficult due to their complexity, and because companion sites and control groups are challenging to designate (Ellsworth & Kauffman, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some long-term (>5 year) studies are possible at the plot scale, studies at the landscape scale are difficult due to their size, and heterogeneity (Reed-Dustin et al, 2016). Studies of post-fire vegetation regrowth, including fuel succession and the effects of precipitation and temperature on the regrowth at regional to landscape scales are lacking (Prichard et al, 2017). Understanding long term and large scale dynamics helps us to interpret fire responses, and where and when mitigation is most efficient and effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%