2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tamm Review: Selection system reduces long-term volume growth in Fennoscandic uneven-aged Norway spruce forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, basal area and standing volume are more comparable (Figure 2). Growth rate is smaller than generally reported for comparative fertilities in nonstationary forestry (Figure 4) [7,11,14,17,[45][46][47][48]. These observations are directly due to Equations (3)- (5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, basal area and standing volume are more comparable (Figure 2). Growth rate is smaller than generally reported for comparative fertilities in nonstationary forestry (Figure 4) [7,11,14,17,[45][46][47][48]. These observations are directly due to Equations (3)- (5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The amount of trees in the stationary forest, in terms of number of individuals (Figure 1), appears rather small in comparison to nonstationary forest systems [7,11,14,17,45,46]. On the other hand, basal area and standing volume are more comparable (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The number of trees in a natural stationary forest appears small in comparison to non-stationary forest ecosystems (Figs. 1, 7;Pukkala 2006;Tahvonen 2011;Rämö and Tahvonen 2015;Lundqvist 2017;Sinha et al 2017;Valkonen et al 2017). The growth rate is less than that reported for comparative sites in non-stationary forests (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In northern Europe, however, data about the effect of uneven-aged forestry on soil carbon dynamics is sparse because most forests are managed following even-aged silviculture. In a recent review, Lundqvist (2017) concluded that selection cuttings have somewhat reduced the volume growth of Norway spruce stands in Fenno-Scandia if compared with even-aged stands, but similar comprehensive comparisons have not been carried out on carbon sequestration. However, Nilsen & Strand (2013) analysed data from an 81-year long comparative experiment of Norway spruce management in Norway to assess the effect of management on the carbon sequestration in the stands, finding that the even-aged stand contained more carbon both in the vegetation and soil than the uneven-aged stand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litter production is important for soil carbon accumulation, and it largely depends on the amount of stand biomass and its allocation to foliage and fine roots that have the fastest turnover rates. This will likely vary between even-aged and uneven-aged stands (Nilsen & Strand 2013, Lundqvist 2017). An important factor that may be causing differences in litter decomposition is the more open stand structure of uneven-aged stands, typically consisting of closed-canopy and gap patches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%