Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
In the ever-present fight against poverty, governments are in constant need of effective and efficient policy instruments. Typically, poverty is addressed by tax-based systems of social grants. However, due to financial constraints, instruments that seek to involve the private sector gain more and more attention. Creating such synergies is particularly important for developing countries. In this context, South Africa has implemented and further developed a system of preferential procurement. While the 'traditional' focus of public procurement is 'value for money', procurement policies increasingly pursue other goals, such as social or environmental ones. In South Africa, one of the award criteria is the tenderer's B-BBEE status. In doing so, public procurement in South Africa also aims at redressing past inequalities. Moreover, it is perceived as a valuable instrument in the fight against poverty. This article tries to develop an analytical framework in which the effectiveness and efficiency of the South African system of preferential procurement can be assessed. The argumentation builds on two hypotheses: First, the South African system of preferential procurement pursues two different goals: the promotion of equality and the alleviation of poverty. Second, preferential procurement is ineffective with regards to both these goals. Thus the focus lies not on the viability of horizontal policies in general but on horizontal policies for particular purposes. Furthermore, the article takes into account both the economic perspective as well as the normative perspective. There are several factors that cause doubts whether preferential procurement in South Africa effectively addresses poverty issues. Consequently, if we are to justify preferential procurement, we need to adopt a normative view and focus on the concept of substantive equality. Unlike social grants, preferential procurement is capable of promoting the participative dimension of equality -an important aspect of the transformational process in South Africa.
In the ever-present fight against poverty, governments are in constant need of effective and efficient policy instruments. Typically, poverty is addressed by tax-based systems of social grants. However, due to financial constraints, instruments that seek to involve the private sector gain more and more attention. Creating such synergies is particularly important for developing countries. In this context, South Africa has implemented and further developed a system of preferential procurement. While the 'traditional' focus of public procurement is 'value for money', procurement policies increasingly pursue other goals, such as social or environmental ones. In South Africa, one of the award criteria is the tenderer's B-BBEE status. In doing so, public procurement in South Africa also aims at redressing past inequalities. Moreover, it is perceived as a valuable instrument in the fight against poverty. This article tries to develop an analytical framework in which the effectiveness and efficiency of the South African system of preferential procurement can be assessed. The argumentation builds on two hypotheses: First, the South African system of preferential procurement pursues two different goals: the promotion of equality and the alleviation of poverty. Second, preferential procurement is ineffective with regards to both these goals. Thus the focus lies not on the viability of horizontal policies in general but on horizontal policies for particular purposes. Furthermore, the article takes into account both the economic perspective as well as the normative perspective. There are several factors that cause doubts whether preferential procurement in South Africa effectively addresses poverty issues. Consequently, if we are to justify preferential procurement, we need to adopt a normative view and focus on the concept of substantive equality. Unlike social grants, preferential procurement is capable of promoting the participative dimension of equality -an important aspect of the transformational process in South Africa.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.