2014
DOI: 10.3198/jpr2014.03.0016crc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘TAM 112’ Wheat, Resistant to Greenbug and Wheat Curl Mite and Adapted to the Dryland Production System in the Southern High Plains

Abstract: ‘TAM 112’ (Reg. No. CV‐1101, PI 643143), a hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar with experimental designation TX98V9628, was developed and released by Texas A&M AgriLife Research in 2005. TAM 112 is an F4–derived line from the cross U1254‐7‐9‐2‐1/TXGH10440 made at Vernon, TX, in 1992. U1254‐7‐9‐2 is a USDA–ARS germplasm line from the Plant Science and Entomology Research unit, Manhattan, KS, and TXGH10440 is a sibling selection of the cultivar TAM 110. TAM 112 is an awned, medium‐early maturin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hard red winter wheat cultivars TAM 111 and TAM 112 (Lazar et al, 2004;Rudd et al, 2014), are widely cultivated on the SGP and continue to gain popularity among producers. The germplasm resources of these cultivars are used by breeding programs in the US and around the world to improve drought tolerance in arid and semiarid production regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hard red winter wheat cultivars TAM 111 and TAM 112 (Lazar et al, 2004;Rudd et al, 2014), are widely cultivated on the SGP and continue to gain popularity among producers. The germplasm resources of these cultivars are used by breeding programs in the US and around the world to improve drought tolerance in arid and semiarid production regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf symptom production on OK05312 was similarly suppressed. No significant difference was found between OK05312 and its putative donor source of curl mite resistance, KS96WGRC40, or between OK05312 and TAM 112, a cultivar deployed in the Texas High Plains for its curl mite resistance (Price et al, 2014; Rudd et al, 2014) OK05312 also showed a moderate level of resistance to the mite population collected in Nebraska, although a similar level of resistance was found in Endurance (data not shown). Molecular marker WMS904 confirmed the presence of Cmc4 in OK05312, which is the only gene yet to be identified in OK05312 associated with WCM resistance.…”
Section: Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The WCM exists in mixed populations of two biotypes (1 and 2) in North America (Harvey et al, 1999; Hein et al, 2012; Malik, 2001). Acaricides have never been developed to control A. tosichella (Morgan et al, 2005), prompting the development of mite‐resistant wheat cultivars ‘Salmon’ and ‘TAM 107’ containing the Cmc3 gene (Martin et al, 1983; Schlegel and Kynast, 1987), ‘Radiant’ in western Canada containing Cmc1 (Thomas et al, 2012), and ‘TAM 112’ with gene names yet to be released (Rudd et al, 2014). In 1996, the Wheat Genetics Resource Center (WGRC) released the germplasm line KS96WGRC40 containing both Cmc3 and Cmc4 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wheat cultivar 'Karl 92' was used as a susceptible check and TAM 112 as a resistant check (Price et al, 2014;Rudd et al, 2014). This included 40 lines from the Northern Regional Performance Nursery (NRPN, 2014), which contained advanced wheat lines from South Dakota, Nebraska, Montana, and Canada; 40 lines from the Southern Regional Performance Nursery (SRPN, 2014), comprised of lines from South Dakota, Nebraska, Texas, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Colorado; 40 lines from Texas Elite yield trials (TXE) in 2013, composed of lines from Texas A&M AgriLife wheat breeding programs; and 52 other released cultivars and elite breeding (CEB) lines from the southern Great Plains.…”
Section: Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultivars Amigo (PI 578213, Sebesta et al, 1995), 'TAM 110' (Lazar et al, 1997), 'TAM 303,' and 'WB-cedar' have 1AL.1RS and all were resistance to TWCMC1 and susceptible to TWCMC2 (Table 1). Cultivars Byrd and TAM 204, both derived from TAM 112 (Haley et al, 2012;Rudd et al, 2014), do not have 1AL.1RS and still showed resistant to TWCMC2. The Ae.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Cultivars and Breeding Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%