1981
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300030015x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tall Fescue and Smooth Bromegrass. I. Nitrogen and Water Requirements1

Abstract: Irrigated cool‐season grasses are needed in the Southern High Plains to extend grazing provided by winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) pasture and native range. Little information is available concerning their N requirements in relation to irrigation water application. The main objective of this study was to determine the N and water requirements for sustained high production of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.). ‘Fawn’ tall fescue and ‘Southland’ smooth br… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
2
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result may have been a response of the fescue to the two passes of the application knives (once in fall and once in late winter); however, Moyer and Sweeney (1990) found no enhancement in final yield from knife-only passage without fertilizer N. Regardless, overall forage production above that obtained with the no-N control averaged 30 lb forage/lb fertilizer N at the 75 lb N acre −1 rate but was reduced to 23 lb forage/lb fertilizer N at the higher 150 kg N ha −1 rate. These values and the decline in efficiency of N conversion to dry matter with increasing N rate are similar to values reported by Phillips et al (1993) and Eck et al (1981), even though N rates and fescue management differed from our study. The CP, NDF, and IVDMD quality parameters measured for fescue harvested for hay was affected by the N placement method and to a lesser extent by N fertilizer timing and rate (Table 3).…”
Section: Hay Harvest Measurementssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This result may have been a response of the fescue to the two passes of the application knives (once in fall and once in late winter); however, Moyer and Sweeney (1990) found no enhancement in final yield from knife-only passage without fertilizer N. Regardless, overall forage production above that obtained with the no-N control averaged 30 lb forage/lb fertilizer N at the 75 lb N acre −1 rate but was reduced to 23 lb forage/lb fertilizer N at the higher 150 kg N ha −1 rate. These values and the decline in efficiency of N conversion to dry matter with increasing N rate are similar to values reported by Phillips et al (1993) and Eck et al (1981), even though N rates and fescue management differed from our study. The CP, NDF, and IVDMD quality parameters measured for fescue harvested for hay was affected by the N placement method and to a lesser extent by N fertilizer timing and rate (Table 3).…”
Section: Hay Harvest Measurementssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…T all wheatgrass is well adapted to the Southern High Plains (Schuster and Garcia, 1973) and the Middle Rio Grande Valley of the USA (Jones and Hooks, 1976). It is widely used in year‐round grazing systems during the early spring and fall when small‐grains pastures are not available and before and after warm‐season species are productive (Eck et al, 1981; Schuster and Garcia, 1973; Undersander and Naylor, 1987). Tall wheatgrass is also used throughout the summer in lieu of warm‐season pastures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable information about N fertility of other perennial cool‐season grasses in the literature (Black, 1968; Campbell et al, 1986; Collins, 1991; Cooper and Hyder, 1959; Eck et al, 1981; Frame, 1991; Frank and Bauer, 1991; Power, 1980). Power (1980), however, mentioned that one of the more important factors affecting the response to N fertility was grass species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across years, increasing N rate lowered overall agronomic N use efficiency at both the R4 and stubble hay harvests from near 26 lb dry matter/lb N with 50 lb N/acre to ~15 lb dry matter/lb N at 200 lb N/acre (data not shown). As in this study, commonly occurring, nonlinear yield responses of tall fescue to increasing N rates have resulted in reduced agronomic N use efficiency with increasing N fertilization (Eck et al, 1981;Phillips et al, 1993;Sweeney and Moyer, 2014).…”
Section: Tall Fescue Forage Use and Agronomic Nitrogen Use Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 75%