2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00222.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Talking whilst walking: a geographical archaeology of knowledge

Abstract: This paper explores how understandings of the knowledge and lives of individuals can be gained through making geographical context more explicit within qualitative research methods. The paper will focus on 'conversations in place'. More particularly, it will suggest that conversations held whilst walking through a place have the potential to generate a collage of collaborative knowledge. Drawing on the work of Casey, the paper builds upon the notion of the 'constitutive co-ingredience' of place and human ident… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
330
0
12

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 418 publications
(363 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
330
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of these interviews utilized 'go along' or 'mobile' ethnographic methods which involves walking or driving with informants through the spaces in which they live and work on a daily basis (see Anderson 2004;Kusenbach 2003). In addition, I conducted a three month internship with the Penang Heritage Trust (PHT), a civil society organization based in George Town, which has been one of the primary actors involved in lobbying against swiftlet farming in the city.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these interviews utilized 'go along' or 'mobile' ethnographic methods which involves walking or driving with informants through the spaces in which they live and work on a daily basis (see Anderson 2004;Kusenbach 2003). In addition, I conducted a three month internship with the Penang Heritage Trust (PHT), a civil society organization based in George Town, which has been one of the primary actors involved in lobbying against swiftlet farming in the city.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research in Martham was conducted during September 2013 and included twenty-seven interviews; eight of which were conducted as walking interviews. The selection of a mobile or sedentary interview was determined by participant preference (influenced by factors such as personal mobility and weather conditions), though walking interviews provided the added benefits of providing visual references to participants' narratives and offering the researcher insights into the affective, emotional and embodied aspects of relationships with place (Anderson, 2004).…”
Section: Research Context and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By walking we do not mean just the act of moving through the city on foot but also include related processes of standing, casual interaction, and observation. We draw on a well-established intellectual lineage in emphasizing walking in contrast to other means of moving in urban contexts (Anderson 2004;Blomley 2010;Edensor 2010;Middleton 2011). Certainly, facilitating pedestrianism is one of the core tasks of the built environment; although driving and biking are important modes of mobility, even late modern "car-centric" cities are working to include improved infrastructure that enables walking as a core mode of everyday circulation in areas of core density (Middleton 2011).…”
Section: Walking As Urban Observation: a Methodological Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walking has long contributed insights to qualitative urban research, helping us generate geographical questions informed by observation of the use of space over time that might not be easy to capture through other methods (Anderson 2004;Moles 2008;Edensor 2010). In particular, walking offers an opportunity for serendipitous discovery of unexpected contexts for social and spatial conjunction.…”
Section: Toward Explicit Comparative Walking Practicementioning
confidence: 99%