2009
DOI: 10.1080/02601370902799077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Talking up learning at work: Cautionary tales in co‐opting everyday learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study assists us in understanding the interplay of structured learning and everyday learning (Boud, Rooney, & Solomon, 2009) within the context of academic development. It draws on one example of each; structured learning is represented by a formal development program, and everyday learning is represented by informal 'corridor' conversations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This study assists us in understanding the interplay of structured learning and everyday learning (Boud, Rooney, & Solomon, 2009) within the context of academic development. It draws on one example of each; structured learning is represented by a formal development program, and everyday learning is represented by informal 'corridor' conversations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Another example of this kind of transformation can be found in a study by Boud, Rooney, and Solomon () where the formalization of everyday talk resulted in it being transformed into compulsory talk, which made the workers feel it had changed into something pointless. Thus, something that is informal and inspiring may turn into “just another meeting” (Rooney & Boud, ).…”
Section: The Implications Of Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many purposes it might not be useful to single it out for attention. Tensions arise between naming and codifying 'learning' that may be of value to individuals for professional registration purposes, and acknowledging learning as an integral part of work and thus a normal everyday activity that would be distorted by formalization [22]. The more integral learning is to the practice of work, the more problematic it is to treat it independently of work for official recognition.…”
Section: Learning and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%