2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/percomw.2017.7917544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Talk, text or tag?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then demonstrate how case studies in the use of the SPHERE ADL ontology have been used to aggregate data about the ontology in use, thus allowing us to perform a series of data-and application-based evaluations of the ontology [ 12 ]—that is, through evaluation of the performance of the applications powered by the ontology, and of the data collected through those applications, strengths and weaknesses of the ontology itself are identified. This article extends preliminary work previously published by Woznowski et al [ 13 , 14 ] by describing the development of the SPHERE ADL ontology, expressing its relationship to related knowledge structures and critically evaluating the ontology by reference to experience gained in its use in two case studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We then demonstrate how case studies in the use of the SPHERE ADL ontology have been used to aggregate data about the ontology in use, thus allowing us to perform a series of data-and application-based evaluations of the ontology [ 12 ]—that is, through evaluation of the performance of the applications powered by the ontology, and of the data collected through those applications, strengths and weaknesses of the ontology itself are identified. This article extends preliminary work previously published by Woznowski et al [ 13 , 14 ] by describing the development of the SPHERE ADL ontology, expressing its relationship to related knowledge structures and critically evaluating the ontology by reference to experience gained in its use in two case studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…We begin with the most straightforward of these, the use of the ontology within an annotation tool used by a post-hoc observer working from scripted, recorded data, in this case video data [ 42 ]. The second case is the use of the ontology within an annotation tool [ 14 ] intended to support unscripted annotation in free living within a smart home environment, in this case a home in which the SPHERE system is deployed.…”
Section: The Role Of Case Studies In Validation and Revision Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows for producing very precise high quality annotation as the annotator can go back and re-annotate problematic parts of the log; 2. by directly observing the experiment participant and manually labelling their behaviour [ 16 ]. This allows for producing annotation on the run, which saves time, but, at the same time, produces annotation with relatively low reliability; 3. by self-annotating one’s own behaviour during the experiment [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]. This reduces the costs for external observer or offline annotation based on video logs.…”
Section: Annotation Of Human Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a fundamental step towards intelligent healthcare, activity recognition and indoor localisation lie at the core of the ML component within the SPHERE system. However, as described in the previous section, ground truth for activities and locations are particularly hard to obtain in a smart home environment [36]. The difficulties can be seen from two perspectives.…”
Section: Annotation Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%