The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1080/02500160903525072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Talk about it: The effects of cryptic HIV/AIDS billboards

Abstract: According to the South African health organisation loveLife, billboards with cryptic messages that the target group finds difficult or impossible to understand will give rise to dialogue with peers and parents. According to Hoeken et al. (2009), however, perceived comprehension is a necessary condition for such dialogues. These contradictory views were investigated in an experiment. Five loveLife billboards, together with a questionnaire, were presented to 149 first-year university students. Contradictory to l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
10
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As with the findings of Jansen & Janssen (2010), the findings of the present study seem to contradict loveLife's supposition that the cryptic nature of their billboard messages will lead to discussions and debate. Instead, the assumption described by Hoeken et al (2009) is better supported: that the better young people think they understand HIV/AIDS messages, the greater the chance that they will appreciate these messages and the higher the probability they will engage in discussions about HIV and AIDS.…”
Section: Perceived Comprehensioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…As with the findings of Jansen & Janssen (2010), the findings of the present study seem to contradict loveLife's supposition that the cryptic nature of their billboard messages will lead to discussions and debate. Instead, the assumption described by Hoeken et al (2009) is better supported: that the better young people think they understand HIV/AIDS messages, the greater the chance that they will appreciate these messages and the higher the probability they will engage in discussions about HIV and AIDS.…”
Section: Perceived Comprehensioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…A considerable gap was found between perceived comprehension and actual comprehension. As was the case in Lubinga et al (2010) and in Jansen and Janssen (2010), participants in the present study overestimated their level of understanding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…questionnaire studies in which conversations on health issues are studied indirectly, for instance by asking participants to report on past conversation behavior (e.g., Chatterjee et al, 2009;Frank et al, 2012;Helme et al, 2011;Van den Putte et al, 2011;, or on their intention to engage in conversations on a certain topic (e.g., Jansen & Janssen, 2010;Lubinga, Schulze, Jansen, & Maes, 2010;Lubinga, Jansen, & Maes, 2014). Thus, these studies mainly focused on whether or not conversations took place, i.e., conversational occurrence.…”
Section: 1the Role Of Interpersonal Health Communication In the Permentioning
confidence: 99%