Talent management in hospitality and tourism: a systematic literature review and research agenda

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to provide a systematic literature review (SLR) of extant research on talent management (TM) in hospitality and tourism (H&T). The objectives are first, to offer an empirical mapping analysis of TM research in H&T; second, to identify and discuss key research topics; and third, to recommend avenues for future research. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a SLR of TM literature in the context of H&T by analysing peer-reviewed papers published between January 2000 and October 2020. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis process, three independent coders undertook a content analysis of 74 papers for the SLR. Findings The authors found that TM in H&T offers contextualised evidence consistent on five key research topics: TM practices; conceptualisation of talent and TM; TM antecedents and outcomes; key TM stakeholders; and talent education and graduate careers. The analysis indicated that most studies are qualitative, focussed on Europe and North America and that primarily examine hotels. The small number of TM studies in H&T along with the lack of strong theoretical groundings show that the field is at the early stages of the growing stage, yet the sharp increase demonstrates an exponential growth in interest. Practical implications This study highlights the importance of TM and indicates that businesses in the sector need to reconsider the definition of talent, their approaches to TM and the bundling of TM practices to improve their effectiveness. It also calls for partnerships among the industry’s key stakeholders and a revisiting of agendas for educators. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that offers a holistic examination of research on a wide range of TM topics within various H&T sectors over the past 20 years. It clarifies the conceptualisation of talent and TM in this field and provides insights, as well as context-specific evidence on the management of H&T talent. This study is the first to argue that the research stream is moving towards a growth stage and offers recommendations on advancing the field.

Learning effectiveness of 3D virtual reality in hospitality training: a situated cognitive perspective

“…The hospitality industry has long been challenged by high employee turnover and labor shortage (Kravariti et al , 2021). Internal marketing is suggested to improve employee commitment and reduce turnover (Frye et al , 2020).…”

Retaining talented employees during COVID-19 pandemic: The leverage of hotel pandemic response strategies

“…The criteria to select talent respondents were guided by the literature on talent management and by the recommendation of the head of HR or the heads of talent management. Consistent with talent management literature, the study used the following criteria: (a) being a manager or employee with high potential and high performing; (While specific definitions depend on organisational contexts, a strong focus is placed on high performers and/or high potentials); (b) having at least 12 months of experience in the organization, and (c) being retained during the COVID-19 pandemic period consistent with the study context to examine the relationships of response strategies with talent retention ( Collings and Mellahi, 2009 ; Jooss et al, 2019 , 2022 ; Kravariti, et al, 2022 ; Mai and Thuy 2021 ; Tansley, et al, 2007 ; Zhang et al, 2014 ).…”

“…The talent shortage problem could cost the global economy 14 million jobs and nearly US$610 billion in GDP by 2024 ( WTTC, 2015 ). It could mean a significant loss of presently qualified talent and the loss of an irreplaceable future asset for all stakeholders ( Fuentes, 2021 ; Jooss et al, 2019 , 2022 ; Kravariti et al, 2022 ).…”

Intellectual structure of leadership studies in hospitality and tourism

“…Although a large and growing body of empirical research has examined leadership, few review and meta-analysis studies have generated an overview of different leadership styles and outcomes in the past decade (Elkhwesky et al , 2022; Kravariti et al , 2022). For example, based on 63 empirical studies, Gui et al (2020) conducted a meta-analysis of the link between transformational leadership, employee relational perceptions and attitudinal and behavioral outcomes.…”