2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Talent management: Current theories and future research directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
301
0
25

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 383 publications
(366 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
301
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some authors argue that the unseen costs of exclusive TM, such as high rates of turnover among the 'non-talented', are not taken into account in the assessment of exclusive TM (Pfeffer 2001), with workforce differentiation becoming a 'double-edged sword' as the losses among employees identified as 'nontalented' may minimize or even outweigh the benefits accrued from the increased performance of those identified as 'talented' (Marescaux et al 2013). This argument has led to a call for TM to be understood as a relational construct (Al Ariss et al 2014), where, individual, organizational, institutional and national relationships are taken into account. This would involve researching further how employees perceive their respective talents are being managed in the organization and their varying reactions to these perceptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some authors argue that the unseen costs of exclusive TM, such as high rates of turnover among the 'non-talented', are not taken into account in the assessment of exclusive TM (Pfeffer 2001), with workforce differentiation becoming a 'double-edged sword' as the losses among employees identified as 'nontalented' may minimize or even outweigh the benefits accrued from the increased performance of those identified as 'talented' (Marescaux et al 2013). This argument has led to a call for TM to be understood as a relational construct (Al Ariss et al 2014), where, individual, organizational, institutional and national relationships are taken into account. This would involve researching further how employees perceive their respective talents are being managed in the organization and their varying reactions to these perceptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until further research is able to clarify some of the fundamental issues around GTM (Collings, 2014), it is difficult to establish concise guidelines for inpatriate. However, this paper attempts to take one step closer in identifying the appropriate GTM technique of inpatriate managers as boundary-spanners, knowing that the literature has not kept pace with practice (Al Ariss, Cascio, & Paauwe, 2014).…”
Section: Developing a Gtm Infrastructure To Support Inpatriate Managementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An organisation's ability to attract and retain the best talent is therefore one of the most important determinants of organisational effectiveness (Armstrong, 2006;Kehinde, 2012;Singh & Finn, 2003). Those organisations that differentiate themselves in their attraction, development and retention strategies are the ones that ultimately succeed (Al Ariss, Cascio & Paauwe, 2014;Schlechter et al, 2014;Tarique & Schuler, 2010).…”
Section: Research Purposementioning
confidence: 99%