2015
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1421587112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TALE nickase-mediatedSP110knockin endows cattle with increased resistance to tuberculosis

Abstract: Transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN)-mediated genome modification has been applied successfully to create transgenic animals in various species, such as mouse, pig, and even monkey. However, transgenic cattle with gene knockin have yet to be created using TALENs. Here, we report site-specific knockin of the transcription activator-like effector (TALE) nickase-mediated SP110 nuclear body protein gene (SP110) via homologous recombination to produce tuberculosis-resistant cattle. In vitro and in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
112
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
112
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Zinc finger nickases and transcription activator-like effector (TALE) nickases have been made by generating a D450A mutation in the FokI nuclease domain, but these nickases appear to have noticeable residual nuclease activity (Ramirez et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2012;Wu et al, 2015). On the contrary, either of the two endonuclease domains of Cas9, HNH, and RuvC can be mutated to form nickases (Gasiunas et al, 2012;Jinek et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zinc finger nickases and transcription activator-like effector (TALE) nickases have been made by generating a D450A mutation in the FokI nuclease domain, but these nickases appear to have noticeable residual nuclease activity (Ramirez et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2012;Wu et al, 2015). On the contrary, either of the two endonuclease domains of Cas9, HNH, and RuvC can be mutated to form nickases (Gasiunas et al, 2012;Jinek et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many considered uses of the technology are the same as those already considered in current breeding programs including production, health, and welfare, but with targeted efforts on known causative variants. Examples of edited dairy cattle include cattle with increased resistance to tuberculosis (Wu et al, 2015), the knockout of the betalactoglobulin gene , and enhanced mastitis resistance (Liu et al, 2013(Liu et al, , 2014. A promising first use of gene editing in the dairy industry to address welfare issues may be the production of hornless dairy cattle with the introduction of the POLLED allele, which is nearly fixed in some beef breeds but low in frequency in Holsteins (Carlson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Genome Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of engineered endonucleases (EENs), including zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) [151], transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) [152] and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR/Cas9) [153]), allows to cut a specific position in DNA sequence and then use endogenous cellular pathways to direct DNA repair to introduce specified alterations to the DNA sequence. Genome-editing approaches have been successfully used in different livestock species, such as pig [154,155], goat [156], cattle [157] and sheep [158]. In dairy cows, these technologies have been used to manipulate the genome so that they produce specific milk types, such as milk that causes less allergic problems (e.g.…”
Section: Genome Editing Technology and Non-coding Rnamentioning
confidence: 99%