home/cnuWith keen interest, I read the article by Curragh and colleagues 1 entitled 'Takotsubo syndrome: voices to be heard', which was published in this issue of the European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. According to the authors, what is woefully lacking is a patient perspective on the effects of Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) and how care can be improved. Reading the manuscript by Curragh et al., it became abundantly clear to me that some key parts needed to be highlighted.The authors discuss four factors that may influence why many patients are dissatisfied with the care provided. These factors are: (a) TTS is a relatively new condition and the knowledge base about treatment is limited and not widely disseminated among clinicians; (b) the age and sex profile of the patient group; (c) TTS is sometimes wrongly categorised as 'psychosomatic'; and (d) people with TTS may be labelled as over-emotional if they do not recover quickly. In my opinion these factors, especially (b), (c) and (d), are closely interrelated. There is a history of using psychosocial explanations to explain the aetiology of diseases that are predominated by women. 2 Women have been seen as more emotional and vulnerable than men and therefore are more likely to somaticise their psychological distress. Women's problems are more likely to be perceived as influenced by emotional valence (e.g. stressors and anxiety), 3 which may lead to dismissal because they are regarded as 'overexcited' or as the cause of their disease (aka 'blaming the victim'). These perceptions may also play a role in the delay of diagnosis and management of women with cardiovascular disease. 4 The contemporary status of TTS remains shrouded in mystery. With an unclear aetiology, newness of the diagnosis, connection to stress and dramatic onset, came speculation of what kind of disease this is and why women are overrepresented. Focus soon turned to stress alone. The catchy phrase 'broken heart syndrome' did not help matters. Focusing on only one aspect of a condition, in this case stress, may be detrimental for knowledge development in a field. In the case of TTS focusing on stress was not guided by what was most important for the patient. We all agree that symptoms are an important aspect of the illness experience and thus can likely have a marked effect on a person's healthrelated quality of life. As Curragh and colleagues 1 write, symptoms are also an important issue to consider in patients with TTS. Research on self-reported symptoms affecting patients with TTS needs to be integrated with objective evidence if we hope to engage patients and improve the care process. Research within nursing has to focus on improving care, but it also has always to have the patient's perspective in mind. As researchers within cardiovascular nursing, we need to take the path from words to action to investigate the issues most important to patients with TTS.
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) have no conflicts of interest to declare.