‘Taking up the Slack’ in the Context of Refugee Protection

Hoesch, Matthias

doi:10.1007/s42048-018-0012-1

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For those, as well as other reasons adduced by Owen (2016), Hoesch (2018), and others, such as Cullity (2006), the conservative view is mistaken and should be rejected.…”

Section: What's Wrong With the Conservative Viewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These questions arise urgently in the face of catastrophic climate change, global poverty and resistance to oppression. 1 They also arise, as a sizeable literature illustrates (Hoesch 2018;Miller 2016;Owen 2016Owen , 2018Stemplowska 2016), in relation to the problem of refugee protection in a world in which many states refuse to open their borders to them. I focus here on this last problem, addressing a debate that has recently unfolded in the pages of this journal between David Owen and Matthias Hoesch.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Coercing Compliers to Do More Than One’s Fair Share

Stemplowska

2019

ZEMO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Is there a duty to do more than one's fair share of solving collective problems? If there is, can those who do less than their fair share coerce others to do more? These questions arise urgently in relation to the problem of refugee protection. The fact that various states host refugees to a dramatically different extent is due to a range of factors but the most prominent one is that, on the whole, states devote their differential capabilities to the aim of not hosting them. When some states fail to host-or otherwise assist-as many refugees as they should, must other states do more than their fair share in order to solve the problem of providing refugees with an appropriate place to live? I examine what I call the conservative, moderate and responsive answers to this question. I defend the responsive view and argue that there is a duty to do more than one's fair share here and that such a duty is always enforceable.

show abstract

“…For those, as well as other reasons adduced by Owen (2016), Hoesch (2018), and others, such as Cullity (2006), the conservative view is mistaken and should be rejected.…”

Section: What's Wrong With the Conservative Viewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coercing Compliers to Do More Than One’s Fair Share

Stemplowska

2019

ZEMO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Open Borders Claim in a Nonideal World

Hoesch

Kleinschmidt

2020

Münster Lectures in Philosophy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although many writers in political philosophy argue for open borders, the question of what this entails for nonideal worlds has not yet been adequately addressed. Two diverging positions can be discerned in the literature. On the one hand, writers such as Joseph Carens emphasize that borders should only be open under ideal circumstances, and that the Open Borders Claim does not at the present moment justify pursuing a political program. On the other hand, writers such as Andreas Cassee and Kieran Oberman argue that states should open their borders immediately to a great extent. This paper argues against both positions, and sets out an intermediate approach.

show abstract

The limits of nonideal duties: a partial vindication of fair shares

Chahboun

2024

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosoph

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

‘Taking up the Slack’ in the Context of Refugee Protection

Cited by 4 publications

References 8 publications

Coercing Compliers to Do More Than One’s Fair Share

Coercing Compliers to Do More Than One’s Fair Share

The Open Borders Claim in a Nonideal World

The limits of nonideal duties: a partial vindication of fair shares

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About