2001
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2001.5393887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taking Time to Integrate Temporal Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
448
0
12

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 467 publications
(479 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
448
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The field of organization studies has increasingly attended to the role of time in organizational life (Ancona et al 2001;Antonacopoulou and Tsoukas 2002;. Scholars have created a broad range of conceptualizations and typologies of time (Adam 1990;Bakken et al 2013;Mosakowski and Earley 2000), indicating that time is a multifaceted concept.…”
Section: Time In Organizational Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The field of organization studies has increasingly attended to the role of time in organizational life (Ancona et al 2001;Antonacopoulou and Tsoukas 2002;. Scholars have created a broad range of conceptualizations and typologies of time (Adam 1990;Bakken et al 2013;Mosakowski and Earley 2000), indicating that time is a multifaceted concept.…”
Section: Time In Organizational Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Timing also covers the rhythm, timeliness and synchronization of actions and events, as these concepts concern when events occur and how they are related to each other. When something occurs -its timing -can be indicated by clocks and calendars (clock time) and by relation to meaningful events (event time) (Ancona et al 2001;Bluedorn and Denhardt 1988). The timing of organizational routines, for example, may be triggered by events (e.g.…”
Section: Time In Organizational Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way is to test different time-lagged effects of diversity change on team performance change. The number of team performance episodes to choose is researchers' discretionary choice and depends on team types, as discussed above (Ancona et al, 2001;Hollenbeck et al, 2012;Langley et al, 2013;Marks et al, 2001;Zaheer et al, 1999).…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes, for example, top management teams that typically operate for at least 10 years and whose performance is evaluated annually in firm performance (Hollenbeck et al, 2012). Overall, the exact number of performance episodes required for testing DTDT is eventually researchers' judgment call, based on their knowledge of the team (Ancona, Okhuysen, & Perlow, 2001;Zaheer, Albert, & Zaheer, 1999). For example, for top management teams, 1 year might be suitable for testing the contemporaneous effect and 3 years for testing the lasting impact (e.g., Welbourne, Cycyota, & Ferrante, 2007).…”
Section: Team Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dominant linear view of temporality drawn from conventional representations of clock time (digitally embedded in a range of everyday devices) has been widely criticized (Adam 1990(Adam , 2004Glennie and Thrift 1996;Thrift 2004;Wajcman 2015), with a growing recognition of the need to bring differentiated concepts of time to the fore (see Christensson et al 2014). There is a small but expanding call to move beyond objective time (Allman et al 2014) and time-free research (Hassard 1990b, p. 1) or timeless knowledge (Roe et al 2009) to a more conceptually informed theorization in which concepts of time are made more explicit and openly discussed (Ancona et al 2001b;Bluedorn 2002;Dawson and Sykes 2016;Goodman et al 2001). In contributing to this call, we review the use of temporal perspectives in mainstream explanations and critically evaluate the place of time in the development of theoretical frames for understanding storytelling and sensemaking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%