2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1899-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taking the shoulders and pelvis into account in the preoperative classification of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents and young adults (a constructive critique of King’s and Lenke’s systems of classification)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the discrepancy is >2 cm, the radiograph should be performed with the presence of a shoe lift. 9 However, in both classification, the pelvis was not included as part of the classification, which was the subject of the critique by Maurice et al 10…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the discrepancy is >2 cm, the radiograph should be performed with the presence of a shoe lift. 9 However, in both classification, the pelvis was not included as part of the classification, which was the subject of the critique by Maurice et al 10…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the discrepancy is >2 cm, the radiograph should be performed with the presence of a shoe lift. 9 However, in both classification, the pelvis was not included as part of the classification, which was the subject of the critique by Maurice et al 10 Asymmetry of pelvic morphology is often encountered in erect anteroposterior whole spine radiograph in AIS patients. The pelvic axial rotation has been investigated by many authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study supports these observations but also adds to these results on pelvic morphology abnormalities. The latter is an important factor related to the Cobb angle progression [3] and can involve the lumbar curve [33]. Though Stylianides et al [3] reported pelvic morphology in both able-bodied and scoliotic girls and that sagittal spinopelvic balance was analyzed in non-scoliotic [34] and AIS subjects [35], no one has related it to body posture and standing balance yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proximally, the primary concern is to select the level that will achieve maximum deformity correction and fulfill well-balanced shoulders. 16 Lenke's classification recommended fusion of the structural proximal thoracic curve. 7,14 The correction of the main thoracic curve while leaving a structural upper thoracic curve may lead to postoperative clinical shoulder imbalance.…”
Section: In 2001mentioning
confidence: 99%