2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taking the sensory approach: how individual differences in sensory perception can influence mate choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Response differences were seen in association time, i.e., a measure of female choosiness, and head butts and circling, i.e., measures of female preference (as distinguished by Ronald et al, 2012). One P. castelnaui experimental female, although responding to the paired playback stimulation, did not respond differentially, whereas all other experimental subjects, including those of the other two species, did at least in one paired test series per experimental female.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Response differences were seen in association time, i.e., a measure of female choosiness, and head butts and circling, i.e., measures of female preference (as distinguished by Ronald et al, 2012). One P. castelnaui experimental female, although responding to the paired playback stimulation, did not respond differentially, whereas all other experimental subjects, including those of the other two species, did at least in one paired test series per experimental female.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) 2006; Baier & Kramer, 2007) in a more natural setting were, of course, excluded in this laboratory study that focussed on the EOD as a putative sensory basis for assortative mating. Common developmental and conditional factors are also seen as sources for individual differences in female mate choice, and variation in both response readiness and in female sensory detection of male displays is suggested to depend on factors such as nutrient availability, hormone profiles or age (Ronald et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vertebrates, variation in color vision at the individual level (Toomey & McGraw, 2012) can result from differences in carotenoids deposited in intraocular filters such as the lens, cornea or oil droplets ( Heinermann, 1984;Bowmaker, 2008;Toomey et al, 2011). Since carotenoids must be obtained environmentally, poor diet can potentially affect how animals perceive visual signals, and an inability to perceive a color signal can result in poor decisions in agonistic interactions or reduce individuals' ability to select high-quality mates (Ronald et al, 2012;Toomey & McGraw, 2012). Therefore, it is necessary to assess individual variation and take into account the dietary status of focal individuals when conducting experiments with visual cues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, signals are rarely unimodal (Sargent et al, 1998;Ronald et al,2012). There may have been other signals the choice fish produced that overtook the visual signal such as olfactory or auditory cues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation