Taking the long view: an emerging framework for translational psychiatric science

Abstract

Understood in their historical context, current debates about psychiatric classification, prompted by the publication of the DSM-5, open up new opportunities for improved translational research in psychiatry. In this paper, we draw lessons for translational research from three time slices of 20th century psychiatry. From the first time slice, 1913 and the publication of Jaspers' General Psychopathology, the lesson is that translational research in psychiatry requires a pluralistic approach encompassing equally the sciences of mind (including the social sciences) and of brain. From the second time slice, 1959 and a conference in New York from which our present symptom-based classifications are derived, the lesson is that, while reliability remains the basis of psychiatry as an observational science, validity too is essential to effective translation. From the third time slice, 1997 and a conference on psychiatric classification in Dallas that brought together patients and carers with researchers and clinicians, the lesson is that we need to build further on collaborative models of research combining expertise-bytraining with expertise-by-experience. This is important if we are to meet the specific challenges to translation presented by the complexity of the concept of mental disorder, particularly as reflected in the diversity of desired treatment outcomes. Taken together, these three lessons -a pluralistic approach, reliability and validity, and closer collaboration among relevant stakeholders -provide an emerging framework for more effective translation of research into practice in 21st century psychiatry.

The effectiveness of psychodynamic psychotherapies: An update

“…Increasingly, developers have prioritized the implementation of packages without regard to the unique value of each component. These treatment packages evolve in relation to what many now consider a less‐than‐adequate system of diagnostic classification . Transdiagnostic considerations will ultimately outweigh syndrome‐specific treatment recommendations.…”

Risk and resistance perspectives in translation-oriented etiology research

“…Furthermore, it was stated that BNIMH will be re-orienting its research away from DSM categories^ [4]. Nevertheless, this reorientation pertains more to the Bcrisis of psychiatric classification [ 5], which currently satisfies neither clinicians nor researchers, than to the disease outlook of biomedical science and medical practice in general. The categorically defined disease perspective prevails.…”

Social versus biological psychiatry: It’s time for integration! Commentary by Nick Rose

“…Rose (2016) helpfully suggests seeing this view as part of 'formulation' that pulls together peoples reported psychological difficulties and dysphoric experiences in the context of their past and present lives and involves conversations between clinicians, patients and other stakeholders which take account of the persons narrative, their strengths and aspirations. This collective and collaborative view can contribute, not only to our understanding of disorders, but can provide an important means to effectively translate research into practice in psychiatry (Fulford, Bortolotti, & Broome, 2014).…”