Taking the Cinderella speciality to the PROM: developing a patientrelated outcome measure for an older adult mental health service

Abstract

In the UK there has been a shift over the last decade towards the setting of targets by commissioning or regulatory bodies so that health services provide improved levels of care. For mental health services this has occurred in three phases: phase one related to simple key performance indicators (for example collection of patients' diagnostic codes); phase two placed greater emphasis on more meaningful clinical outcome data; the third and most recent phase placed prominence on patient‐focused data collection. We report the development and preliminary findings of a piloting of a patient‐related outcome measure (PROM) and patient‐related experience measure (PREM) created specifically for older adult mental health services in Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust. PROMs/PREMs are in keeping with an increased focus on patients' experience of health care, the provision of quality services and various key policies such as the recent government white paper Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS.

Patient-reported outcomes in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS): Use of idiographic and standardized measures

“…There has been a growing interest in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (Hansen et al, 2010;Shipley et al, 2000;Whelan et al, 2010), but in child mental health contexts there are issues of different perspectives with low concordance between, e.g. children and their parents (Verhulst & Van der Ende, 2008) and with each perspective alone having strengths and weaknesses.…”

Attitudes of the elderly towards interprofessional cooperation and collaborative pharmacy practices: Questionnaire development

“…Descriptive parameters of question scores for questions [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Tabela I Deskriptivni parametri skorova pitanja 12…”

“…In the latest articles, there has been an evident shift from patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) to patient reported experience measures (PREMs) (16,17). Although PROMs and its instruments (EQ-5D and AQoL for measuring the quality of life; NPRS for symptoms of pain and FSS for fatigue symptoms; K10 and PHQ-2 for depression and GAD7 for anxiety; WHODAS 2.0 and ODI for functional ability; SF-36 for self-reported health status; GSE for self-efficacy) are relevant tools with well proven clinical implication, the authors expect that in the future there will be more studies like the article by Singer SJ and associates, designed to measure integrated care (18).…”

“…Rotated factor components for questions[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Tabela II Faktorske rotirane komponente za pitanja[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] …”

“…Statistical parameters of the question score correlation analysis for questions 12-18 Tabela III Statistički parametri analize povezanosti skorova pitanja[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] …”