Taking off the Heat: Narrative Sensemaking in Post-crisis Inquiry Reports

Abstract

Crises represent moments when sensemaking fails. Official reports of post-crisis analyses re-establish patterns of sensemaking. Whereas scholars agree on the narrative basis of post-crisis sensemaking, the means by which meaning is recreated about the confusing events have not been fully investigated. To fill this gap, empirical data are drawn from the series of investigations that took place after the sudden and deadly heat wave that occurred in France during the summer of 2003. Introducing tools from narratology, this article analyses how these reports restore meaning by addressing the following questions: What happened? Was it foreseeable? and Who is responsible? The key narrative choices implied are mapped. A typology of crisis plots is proposed. Building on this typology, the article demonstrates that successive reports progressively built a focused, simplified story about the crisis. Methodological and practical implications for scholars and practitioners using inquiry reports for research and learning are also discussed.

A Diagnostic Method for the Study of Disaster Management: A Review of Fundamentals and Practices

“…The method of classification used was in accordance with the saturation principle for qualitative methods (Corbin & Strauss, 2008). In addition, other authors have reached the same conclusion with regard to a strong convergence in the diagnosis of the management of these crises (Boudes & Laroche, 2009 Table 5 summarizes the principal results of the application of the diagnostic method to each case. The next section presents the details of the diagnosis for each category (planning/preparedness, coordination, leadership and the behaviour of civil society).…”

Narratives and sensemaking of an organizationally-based environmental disaster

“…With a view to contemplating efforts which came after the referred author, the list contained key topics which stemmed, mainly, from research by Gephart (1984Gephart ( , 1993Gephart ( , 1997, Brown (2000Brown ( , 2004, Mills and Weatherbee (2006), O'Connell and Mills (2003), Boudes andLarouche (2009) andTopal (2009), accompanied by the insights found in Weick (1990Weick ( , 1993 relating to the construction of social actors' identities.…”

“…Critical events, such as disasters, represent moments of sensemaking failure; which is only reestablished through official reports of post-crisis analyses (Boudes & Laroche, 2009). Sensemaking properties help to understand the actions, activities and sensemaking processes that occurred within and between several organizations that operate in a disaster (Mills & Weatherbee, 2006).…”

Decision-making in project portfolio management: using the Cynefin framework to understand the impact of complexity

“…Storytelling (Callahan, Rixon, & Schenk, 2006), games and simulations (Leigh & Kinder, 2001) are known tools to make sense of complexity. Stories are richer research instruments than conventional questionnaires and interviews because they bring the subjects' opinion directly into the research field (Berry, 2001;Boudes & Laroche, 2009;A.D. Brown, 2004;A.D.…”