2011
DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/8/5/056002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taking directions: the role of microtubule-bound nucleation in the self-organization of the plant cortical array

Abstract: The highly aligned cortical microtubule array of interphase plant cells is a key regulator of anisotropic cell expansion. Recent computational and analytical work has shown that the non-equilibrium self-organization of this structure can be understood on the basis of experimentally observed collisional interactions between dynamic microtubules attached to the plasma membrane. Most of these approaches assumed that new microtubules are homogeneously and isotropically nucleated on the cortical surface. Experiment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
166
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
166
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only scenario that resulted in consistent skewing without losing well-ordered CMT arrays was an abrupt switching from regular nucleation to branch-form nucleation after the formation of an ordered transverse array [Eren et al, 2010]. As mentioned above, Deinum et al [2011] simulated a related situation in which CMT nucleation continuously transitions from exclusively microtubule-independent to greater microtubule-dependent nucleation with increasing CMT density. This scenario did not result in array skewing in their simulations [Deinum et al, 2011].…”
Section: Factors That Results In Cmt Array Skewingmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The only scenario that resulted in consistent skewing without losing well-ordered CMT arrays was an abrupt switching from regular nucleation to branch-form nucleation after the formation of an ordered transverse array [Eren et al, 2010]. As mentioned above, Deinum et al [2011] simulated a related situation in which CMT nucleation continuously transitions from exclusively microtubule-independent to greater microtubule-dependent nucleation with increasing CMT density. This scenario did not result in array skewing in their simulations [Deinum et al, 2011].…”
Section: Factors That Results In Cmt Array Skewingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As mentioned above, Deinum et al [2011] simulated a related situation in which CMT nucleation continuously transitions from exclusively microtubule-independent to greater microtubule-dependent nucleation with increasing CMT density. This scenario did not result in array skewing in their simulations [Deinum et al, 2011]. However, it is not easy to exactly compare these two studies as the nucleation scenarios, boundary conditions, and parameter ranges differ significantly between them.…”
Section: Factors That Results In Cmt Array Skewingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations