Taking an eventful historic turn down the cultural memory lane

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to find common ground between the supposed incompatible meta-historical positioning of positivism and post-positivism through a turn to mnemohistory in management and organizational history. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on the idea of creative synthesis and positioning theory, the authors interject concepts from cultural memory studies in historical research on business and organizations to encourage management historians and organization theorists interested in joining the dialogue around how the past is known in the present. Using notions of “aftermath” and “events,” the idea of apositivism is written into historical organization studies to focus on understanding the complex ways of how past events translate into history. The critical historic turn event is raised as an exemplar of these ideas. Findings The overview of the emergence of the controversial historic turn in management and organization studies and the positioning of its adherents and antagonists revealed that there may be some commonality between the fragmented sense of the field. It was revealed that effective history vis-à-vis mnemohistory may hold the potential of a shared scholarly ethic. Originality/value The research builds on recent work that has sought to bring together the boundaries of management and organizational history. This paper explains how mnemohistory can offer a common position that is instrumental for theorizing the relationships among the past-infused constructs such as organizational heritage, legacy and identity.

Using ANTi-microhistory to theorize a typology of organizational crisis

“…The proponents of the anti-realist or constructivist view of organizational crisis conceptualize organizational crisis as the leaders’ meaning-making claim that frames the existence of the crisis to fit the leaders’ interests and values (Spector, 2019). For our topology, we adopt the irrealist (Deal et al ., 2021) view of crisis that assumes that facts and interests/values are intertwined. This view implies that the objective realist and the subjective anti-realist views are the ends of a continuum rather than opposing categories.…”

The past masters: the impact of the Evolution of Management Thought on history

“…The answer for this is the concept from Kuhn (1970) of “normal science” – which is the idea of scientists researching, theorizing and observing within a settled paradigm. Scholars have argued over paradigm development within management studies for decades, including management history (Deal et al , 2021). However, there remains a strong consensus over developing theory and testing that theory using quantitative methods such as a database, survey, or even an experiment.…”

The singular touchstone: the enduring relevance of The Evolution of Management Thought

“…These new constituencies decentered the scholarly community toward a clash of different perspectives (Helms Mills and Mills, 2021). The outcome of this clash is a controversy that has led to, at times, adversarial debates in which scholars have been talking past each other (Deal et al , 2021; Novicevic and Mills, 2019). An illustrative example of controversy is the topic of the New Deal – a myriad of social policies proposed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the USA with hopes of bolstering the economy.…”