2001
DOI: 10.1177/088572880102400107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TAKE CHARGE for the Future: A Controlled Field-Test of a Model to Promote Student Involvement in Transition Planning

Abstract: This study investigated the efficacy of an intervention model to promote student involvement in transition planning. The intervention included the coaching of youths in the application of student-directed planning skills to achieve transition goals, peer-based mentorship and parent support, and in-service education for school transition staff. An independent groups, repeated measures design was used to evaluate the impact of the intervention with 43 youth who experienced diverse disabilities. Results indicated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
110
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the disparity in numbers of participants with LD and EBD may limit the findings of the current review, especially since six (50%) of the studies did not disaggregate results by disability (Hoffman & Field, 1995;Lancaster et al, 2002;Martin et al, 2003;Powers et al, 2001;Wehmeyer & Lawrence, 1995;. However, one group study did compare disability group differences for students with Learning Disabilities (LD), Intellectual Disabilities (ID) and EBD.…”
Section: Content Findingsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the disparity in numbers of participants with LD and EBD may limit the findings of the current review, especially since six (50%) of the studies did not disaggregate results by disability (Hoffman & Field, 1995;Lancaster et al, 2002;Martin et al, 2003;Powers et al, 2001;Wehmeyer & Lawrence, 1995;. However, one group study did compare disability group differences for students with Learning Disabilities (LD), Intellectual Disabilities (ID) and EBD.…”
Section: Content Findingsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The lack of promoting vocational training is disappointing considering that research indicates that vocational training is a positive motivator for keeping students with EBD in school and a strong indicator of positive life experiences for this population (Carter, Lane, Pierson, & Glaeser, 2006;. Increasingly, researchers have cited the importance of self-determination and active student involvement in IEP or transition planning meetings (Arndt, Konrad, & Test, 2006;Powers, Turner, Westwood, Matuszewski, Wilson, & Phillips, 2001;Wehmeyer & Lawrence, 1995) as key components to successful adult outcomes for students with disabilities, including EBD. However, research also suggests that students with EBD tend to experience lower levels of selfdetermination and face inadequate preparation in this important skill area .…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Poor Outcomes Of Students With Ebdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…L. E. Powers et al (2001) determined the effectiveness of the Take Charge for the Future lessons to increase students' involvement in transition planning activities and actual participation in transition planning meetings. Allen, Smith, Test, Flowers, and Wood (2001) taught a modified version of the Self-Directed IEP (Martin, Marshall, Maxson, & Jerman, 1996) lesson package and significantly increased the IEP participation skills of students with moderate intellectual disabilities.…”
Section: Development Of Instructional Processes and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%