2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019tc005874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tajik Basin and Southwestern Tian Shan, Northwestern India‐Asia Collision Zone: 3. Preorogenic to Synorogenic Retro‐foreland Basin Evolution in the Eastern Tajik Depression and Linkage to the Pamir Hinterland

Abstract: The Tajik basin archives the orogenic evolution of the Pamir hinterland.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure S2 shows that the single‐grain ages of the four samples from the Neogene rocks are consistent with their sample ages (Table 1; ~24.8–16.4 Ma, median = 21.1 Ma). The sample ages are somewhat higher than or close to the upper limit of the depositional age range (three samples from the Khingou Formation with a stratigraphic age of ~18–12 Ma and one sample from the Baljuvon Formation with a stratigraphic age of ~28–18 Ma; see discussion on the difficult stratigraphic age assignment for these Formations in Klocke et al, 2017 and Dedow et al, 2020). The single‐grain ages of the samples from the Cr 1 rocks are also consistent with their sample ages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure S2 shows that the single‐grain ages of the four samples from the Neogene rocks are consistent with their sample ages (Table 1; ~24.8–16.4 Ma, median = 21.1 Ma). The sample ages are somewhat higher than or close to the upper limit of the depositional age range (three samples from the Khingou Formation with a stratigraphic age of ~18–12 Ma and one sample from the Baljuvon Formation with a stratigraphic age of ~28–18 Ma; see discussion on the difficult stratigraphic age assignment for these Formations in Klocke et al, 2017 and Dedow et al, 2020). The single‐grain ages of the samples from the Cr 1 rocks are also consistent with their sample ages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Furthermore, several thrust sheets, in particular those bounding the central depression of the Tajik basin and the Darvaz fault zone, have matching young AHe ages, suggesting reactivation. Given that growth strata indicate that also the eastern Tajik FTB started to shorten before ~11 Ma (Dedow et al, 2020; Gągała et al, 2020), the clustering of young AHe ages in the eastern Tajik FTB (Vakhsh anticlinorium to eastern Pamir margin) suggests that the young Tajik FTB reactivation is concentrated there. The scarcity of young reactivation in the Uzbek Gissar indicates that after regional synchronous initiation, shortening concentrated in the Tajik basin, where the evaporitic décollement facilitated thin‐skinned deformation; this is particularly true for the eastern Tajik basin, where the widespread and thick salt has enabled related tectonics (e.g., Gągała et al, 2020; Nikolaev, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Tajik basin is the eastern extension of the greater Amu Darya basin, situated in a retrowedge position with respect to the India‐Asia collision zone (Figure 1a). It evolved from a Triassic‐Eocene epicontinental sag basin into an Oligocene‐Recent foreland basin of the Pamir and Tian Shan (e.g., Brookfield & Hashmat, 2001; Carrapa et al, 2015; Chapman et al, 2019; Dedow et al, 2020; Klocke et al, 2017; Nikolaev, 2002). At present, the Tajik basin links to the Amu Darya basin through a narrow corridor between the southwestern termination of the Tian Shan and the Afghan platform (Figure 1b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%