2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taiwan’s 2050 low carbon development roadmap: An evaluation with the MARKAL model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, it is common to predict energy demand on the basis of the developed statistical relationship and the identified driving factors. (Tsai and Chang, 2015) TIMES (Comodi et al, 2012) LEAP (Kumar, 2016) High level High level…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, it is common to predict energy demand on the basis of the developed statistical relationship and the identified driving factors. (Tsai and Chang, 2015) TIMES (Comodi et al, 2012) LEAP (Kumar, 2016) High level High level…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When conducting scenario analyses and policy simulations on carbon emissions at different levels, the common approach is to build a multi-parameter mathematical model in order to distinguish the impact factors of carbon emissions and to design carbon decomposition methods and life cycle assessment to assess components of carbon emissions. These models include the MARKAL model (Tsai and Chang 2015;Deng and Liang 2017), STIRPAT model (Ma et al 2017), BP neural network model, SRIO model, logistic model, system dynamics model, input-output model (Huang et al 2018;Mi et al 2018b) and life cycle assessment model.…”
Section: Decomposition and The Impact Factors Of Carbon Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Tsai and Chang (2015) utilized the MARKAL energy engineering model to simulate the effects of adopting a combination of technology and tax measures under the various carbon reduction targets and low-carbon development scenarios up to 2050 in Taiwan. Bi, Huang and Ye (2015) analyzes the risk of low-carbon technological innovation in emerging economies under globalization, by integrating the method of global value chain (GVC) and technological innovation linear progress into a new analytical framework.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%