2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01695.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tails, Fears, and Risk Premia

Abstract: We show that the compensation for rare events accounts for a large fraction of the average equity and variance risk premia. Exploiting the special structure of the jump tails and the pricing thereof, we identify and estimate a new Investor Fears index. The index reveals large time-varying compensation for fears of disasters. Our empirical investigations involve new extreme value theory approximations and high-frequency intraday data for estimating the expected jump tails under the statistical probability measu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
368
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 696 publications
(394 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
25
368
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The above mechanism advocates that it is the concern about the (unshared) disaster risks, or "crash-o-phobia", that matters the most to the observed pricing. The same economics also explain the regularities of carry trade returns (Section 5.2.1), the UIP anomaly (Section 5.2.2), the time variations of volatility smirk in equity index option pricing (Appendix B.2), and is consistent with the findings by Bollerslev and Todorov (2011) that investors' fear of jump tail risks play a crucial role for explaining risk premia embedded in aggregate equity.…”
Section: Cross-sectional Option Pricing: Time Variationssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The above mechanism advocates that it is the concern about the (unshared) disaster risks, or "crash-o-phobia", that matters the most to the observed pricing. The same economics also explain the regularities of carry trade returns (Section 5.2.1), the UIP anomaly (Section 5.2.2), the time variations of volatility smirk in equity index option pricing (Appendix B.2), and is consistent with the findings by Bollerslev and Todorov (2011) that investors' fear of jump tail risks play a crucial role for explaining risk premia embedded in aggregate equity.…”
Section: Cross-sectional Option Pricing: Time Variationssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The central empirical variable of this paper, as a proxy for economic uncertainty, is the market variance risk premium (VRP)-which is not directly observable but can be esti-4 Alternatively, our empirical result on VRP may be interpreted as compensating for the rare disaster risk (Gabaix, 2011), jump risk (Todorov, 2010;Drechsler and Yaron, 2011), or tail risk (Bollerslev and Todorov, 2011;Kelly, 2011). Alternatively, VRP can be generated from a habit-formation model with sophisticated consumption dynamics (Bekaert and Engstrom, 2010).…”
Section: Variance Risk Premium and Empirical Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, for all datasets containing options, the estimated volatility-of-volatility parameter σv is considerably smaller for the SVJ than for the SV2 and SVJ2. and sizes were estimated following the method described in Bollerslev and Todorov (2011) Jump size estimates under Q are statistically significant and strongly negative (around -10%), which is due to investors' risk aversion to jumps, and yields a non-zero jump risk premium. Similarly, the volatility of the returns' jump sizes is larger under Q than under P. This finding for jumps in returns seems to contrast with the result for the jumps in volatility.…”
Section: A Likelihood Criteria and Parameter Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%