2017
DOI: 10.1177/0091552116686403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tailoring Retention Theories to Meet the Needs of Rural Appalachian Community College Students

Abstract: Objective: Traditional-age students attending a rural community college in Kentucky’s Appalachian region were interviewed, along with faculty members and administrators, to identify phenomena serving as sources of encouragement or as barriers to retention from the point of entry to the point of transfer. Method: Students’ perspectives were collected in a qualitative study and were analyzed using a theoretical foundation of Tinto’s integration theory, enhanced with Kegan’s cognitive development theory and Bourd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…low socioeconomic group, non-campus, part-time and mature students: e.g Davidson and Wilson 2013, Roberts 2011, Sadowski, Stewart and Pediaditis 2018, Thomas 2011, Yorke and Thomas 2003,. rural students(Hlinka 2017), distance/open/e students (e.g Boyle et al 2010, Simpson 2013Pearson 2012…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…low socioeconomic group, non-campus, part-time and mature students: e.g Davidson and Wilson 2013, Roberts 2011, Sadowski, Stewart and Pediaditis 2018, Thomas 2011, Yorke and Thomas 2003,. rural students(Hlinka 2017), distance/open/e students (e.g Boyle et al 2010, Simpson 2013Pearson 2012…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, regardless of first-generation status or low-income status, Appalachian students on average have been shown to struggle with the transition into college (Bryan & Simmons, 2009), are likely to select local two-year institutions over four-year institutions (Wright, 2012), and are more likely than their peers to exit college for a range of reasons (Bryan & Simmons, 2009;Hlinka, 2017;Howley et al, 1996;Wilson & Gore, 2009). These challenges can be particularly pervasive and detrimental to recruiting of participants for programs like ACTION: even when offered financial incentives like hourly pay or stipends, students from rural Appalachian areas have been shown to have strong community networks that rely on these students in a variety of ways-physical labor, emotional support, transportation, childcare-that require extensive time commitments that compete with both school commitments and programs like ACTION (Bryan et al, 2009;Hlinka, 2017;Wright, 2012). When the ACTION Program is placed within the context of these Appalachian educational attainment challenges, the result of the program suggests the model may be having some positive effect on educational attainment and success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model assesses what an educational program is trying to achieve, the characteristics of the student, and what the student experiences in the educational environment (Antonio & Astin, 2012). The benefit of evaluating a program allows students to align their values with college standards versus universal standards (Hlinka, 2017). This tailored strategy can be evaluated after implementation to ensure the plan meets the needs of the institution and its students (Fike & Fike, 2008).…”
Section: Framework: Input-environment-outcome (I-e-o) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%