2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tailoring of magnetic anisotropy by ion irradiation for magnetic tunnel junction sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This same result is also observed for the irradiated samples, providing evidence that the easy axis remains stable despite a decrease in the magnetization. The H//c measurement for the irradiated sample (figure 2(b)) shows a large bifurcation between the FC and ZFC curves at low temperatures (T < 30 K) that is not present in the pristine magnetization (figure 2(a)), suggesting alterations to the magnetic anisotropy of irradiated CST, potentially due to the change in the magnetic exchange coupling upon proton radiation [27][28][29][30]. In contrast, the H//ab magnetization data is similar in both samples, indicating that the applied field is too small to accurately detect any anisotropic effects in this direction, although this observation may also be due to the spin glass behavior.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This same result is also observed for the irradiated samples, providing evidence that the easy axis remains stable despite a decrease in the magnetization. The H//c measurement for the irradiated sample (figure 2(b)) shows a large bifurcation between the FC and ZFC curves at low temperatures (T < 30 K) that is not present in the pristine magnetization (figure 2(a)), suggesting alterations to the magnetic anisotropy of irradiated CST, potentially due to the change in the magnetic exchange coupling upon proton radiation [27][28][29][30]. In contrast, the H//ab magnetization data is similar in both samples, indicating that the applied field is too small to accurately detect any anisotropic effects in this direction, although this observation may also be due to the spin glass behavior.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appropriate ferromagnetic and insulating material choices enhance the TMR ratio in MTJ structures [39]. Moreover, it is observed that the formation of dead layers at the level of the insulating layer in MTJ reduces the TMR percentage and spin polarization [40].…”
Section: System Model and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sensors are based on various principles, such as search coil, anisotropic magnetoresistance, giant magnetoresistance, magnetic tunnel junctions, fluxgate, Hall effect and superconducting quantum interference device systems [3]. Among these, magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ)-based magnetic sensors exploit tunnelling magnetoresistance (TMR), which has revolutionized various fields, from data storage in computer hard disks to medical applications such as biosensors [4][5][6][7][8]. TMR relies on the magnetic properties of the material, such as coercivity and magnetic anisotropy, to detect and measure magnetic fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various strategies have been explored to tailor the anisotropy of Heusler alloys, such as strain-induced anisotropy change [60], buffer layer effects [61,62], doping-induced disorder effects [63] and irradiation [8,[64][65][66]. Modification of the magnetic properties of various materials via irradiation has been reported for several types of irradiations, such as plasma of various gasses [67,68], ionizing radiation [69,70], high-energy protons and cosmic rays, X-rays [71], neutrons [72] and even several low and swift heavy ion irradiations [73,74].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation